A cohort study of results following elective colonic and rectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme

Objective  The use of laparoscopic surgery coupled with an enhanced recovery programme (ERP) has resulted in hospital stays of 4 or less days for colonic and 6 days following rectal resection, in previously reported small selected groups of patients. This report analyses an unselected cohort to determine if such benefits are reproducible.
Method   Consecutive patients undergoing elective colonic or rectal surgery at a single centre between January 2002 and January 2006 were followed. All were included in the ERP and underwent either laparoscopic or open surgery.
Results   The study group comprised 241 patients (mean age of 67 ± standard deviation 14 years and 49% male sex distribution) who underwent elective colorectal resection within the context of an ERP. One hundred and fifty-one (62.7%) patients had malignant disease. Overall, 191 (79.3%) patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure and the remaining underwent an open operation. Postoperative stay was shorter in patients undergoing laparoscopic vs open, colonic surgery (4 days vs 6 days, P  = 0.002). A nonsignificant trend towards reduced postoperative stay was observed for patients undergoing laparoscopic vs open, rectal surgery (6 days vs 9 days, P  = 0.088). Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy demonstrated significantly lower 30-day mortality rates than those undergoing traditional colectomy (3/131 vs 3/39, P  = 0.049).
Conclusion  Laparoscopic colonic surgery in the context of an ERP offers reduced hospital stay and may confer a survival advantage over traditional techniques. These results confirm that previously reported benefits of laparoscopic surgery are reproducible within an unselected population.