|
|||||
|
|
| 西酞普兰与米氮平治疗老年期抑郁症对照研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 魏冬,刘蕴霞,席永稳. 西酞普兰与米氮平治疗老年期抑郁症对照研究[J]. 中国民康医学, 2009, 21(14): 1651-1651,1759. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2009.14.028 |
| 作者姓名： | 魏冬 刘蕴霞 席永稳 |
| 作者单位： | 河南省洛阳市第五人民医院老年科,河南,洛阳,471000 |
| 摘 要： | 目的:比较西酞普兰与米氮平治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效和不良反应.方法:将64例老年期抑郁症患者随机分成两组,疗程8周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应.结果:西酞普兰组和米氮平组显效率分别82.35%和76.7%,两组疗效差异无显著性(P＞0.05),西酞普兰的不良反应少于米氮平.结论:西酞普兰是一种安全、有效的抗抑郁药. |
| 关 键 词： | 西酞普兰 米氮平 老年期抑郁症 |
Citalopram with Mirtazapine treatment senile depression |
|
| WEI Dong,LIU Yun-xia,XI Yong-weng. Citalopram with Mirtazapine treatment senile depression[J]. medical journal of chinese peoples health, 2009, 21(14): 1651-1651,1759. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2009.14.028 | |
| Authors: | WEI Dong LIU Yun-xia XI Yong-weng |
| Abstract: | Objective:To explore the efficacy and side effects of citalopram and mirtazapine in treatment of senile depression.Methods:64 senile depressive patients were randomly divided into two groups for 8 weeks.The trerapeutic response and side effects were evaluated with the HAMD and TESS.Results:The effective rates of citalopram and mirtazapine were 82.35% and 76.7% respectively there were no significant difference in efficacy between the two groups (P＞0.05),citalopram had fewer side effects than mirtazapine.Conclusion:Citalopram is a safe and effective antidepressant. |
| Keywords: | Citalopram Mirtazapine Senile depression |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |