首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

上尿路尿路上皮癌的(18)F-FDG PET/CT诊断及评价
引用本文:刘建业,秦自科,李永红,韩辉,刘卓炜,樊卫,吴沛宏,尧凯,张志凌,蒋丽娟,许镇州,周芳坚. 上尿路尿路上皮癌的(18)F-FDG PET/CT诊断及评价[J]. 中国医学文摘(检验与临床), 2012, 0(5): 269-272
作者姓名:刘建业  秦自科  李永红  韩辉  刘卓炜  樊卫  吴沛宏  尧凯  张志凌  蒋丽娟  许镇州  周芳坚
作者单位:[1]华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室中山大学肿瘤防治中心泌尿外科,广州510060 [2]中山大学肿瘤防治中心核医学科 ,广州510060 [3]中山大学肿瘤防治中心影像介入科,广州510060
摘    要:目的探讨18F-FDG PET/CT在上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析我中心自2000年4月至2010年12月间29例可疑上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的资料,29例患者在介入、手术及其他治疗前均行静脉尿路造影(IVU)、螺旋CT及18F-FDG PET/CT检查。分析3种影像学检查方法的诊断准确性。结果 29例中,18F-FDG PET/CT检查诊断上尿路尿路上皮癌26例(89.7%),26例均经手术病理证实为上尿路尿路上皮癌。对照手术病理结果,IVU的敏感性和特异性分别为64.0%和75.0%;螺旋CT的敏感性和特异性分别为75.0%和80.0%;而18F-FDGPET/CT的敏感性和特异性分别为92.9%和100%。18F-FDG PET/CT的敏感性高于IVU和螺旋CT(P=0.041vsCT,P=0.036vs IVU),同时特异性也高于IVU和螺旋CT(P=0.041vs CT,P=0.036vs IVU)。结论 18F-FDG PET/CT在上尿路尿路上皮癌的诊断中其敏感性和特异性均高于IVU和螺旋CT,为一种有用的临床诊断方法。上尿路尿路上皮癌的最后诊断需经手术病理证实。

关 键 词:18F-FDG  PET  CT  上尿路尿路上皮癌  诊断

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis and evalua- tion of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma
LlU Jian-ye,QIN Zi-ke,LI Vong-hong,HAN Hui,LIU Zhuowei,FAN Wei,WU Pei-Hong,YAO Kai,ZHANG Zhi-ling,J IANG Li-juan,XU Zhen- zhou,ZHOU Fang-jian. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis and evalua- tion of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. , 2012, 0(5): 269-272
Authors:LlU Jian-ye  QIN Zi-ke  LI Vong-hong  HAN Hui  LIU Zhuowei  FAN Wei  WU Pei-Hong  YAO Kai  ZHANG Zhi-ling  J IANG Li-juan  XU Zhen- zhou  ZHOU Fang-jian
Affiliation:. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China , Department of Urology, Cancer Center, Sun Vat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
Abstract:Objective To retrospectively evaluate the diagnosis of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F- FDG-PET/CT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with UTUC suspected undergoing in- travenous urography (IVU), helical computerized tomography (CT) and 'SF-FDG-PET/CT before any surgery, intervention or treatment from April 2000 to December 2010. Final diagnosis of UTUC was con- firmed by surgical pathology results. Relationships between the diagnostic accuracy and various diagnostic tools, including 18F-FDG-PET/CT were analyzed. Results 26 patients (89. 7%) had a positive lSF- FDG-PET/CT study, which were confirmed by surgical pathology for UTUC. The sensitivity and specific- ity of IVU were 64.0M, 75.0%, respectively, and 75.0%, 80.0% for helical CT. The sensitivity and specificity of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT were 92.9 %, 100~~, respectively. The sensitivity of ~8 F-FDG-PET/CT was significantly to CT and IVU in 29 patients (P=0. 041 vs CT, P=0. 036 vs IVU). And the specificity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT was significantly higher compared to CT and IVU in 29 patients (P=0. 041 vs CT, P=0. 036 vs IVU). Conclusions 18 F-FDG-PET/CT is more sensitive and specific than IVU and helical CT in the diagnosis of UTUC. The 18 F-FDG-PET/CT is a useful modality for the diagnosis of UTUC.
Keywords:18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography~Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma  Diagnosis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号