风险护理干预应用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的临床效果

目的 探讨风险护理干预用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的临床效果。 方法 选取2016年2月-2017年3月本院治疗的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者86例作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组各43例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予风险护理干预。比较2组护理质量、患者舒适度和并发症情况。 结果 观察组熟练技能、质量控制、护理满意度评分均高于对照组(t=7.835,P=0.017; t=7.014,P=0.023; t=8.682,P=0.012),护理投诉率低于对照组(χ²=8.444,P=0.004);观察组舒适度的社会维度、心理维度、生理维度、环境维度评分高于对照组;观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(χ²=9.550,P=0.023)。 结论 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者接受风险护理干预,有助于提高护理质量和患者舒适度,降低护理投诉率,改善并发症情况。

Clinical effect of risk nursing intervention for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Objective To explore the clinical effect of applying the risk nursing intervention on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and its effect on the nursing quality and comfort. Methods Totally 86 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated in our hospital between February 2016 and March 2017 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, each of 43. Both groups were given routine nursing, while the observation group was additionally given the risk nursing intervention. The nursing quality, nursing comfort and complications of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The nursing skill, quality and satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (t=7.835,P=0.017; t=7.014,P=0.023; t=8.682,P=0.012), while the nursing complaint rate was significantly lower than the control group (χ²=8.444,P=0.004). The social, psychological, physiological and environmental dimensions of the observation group were all significantly higher than the control group, while the complication rate of the former group was significantly lower than the control group (χ²=9.550,P=0.023). Conclusion The risk nursing intervention can improve nursing quality and comfort level, reduce nursing complaint rate and relieve complications of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.