|
|||||
|
|
| 气压弹道碎石与体外冲击波碎石治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 王光,陈美凤,王雷,陈连清,张红. 气压弹道碎石与体外冲击波碎石治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效比较[J]. 现代医院, 2009, 9(3): 34-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-332X.2009.03.016 |
| 作者姓名： | 王光 陈美凤 王雷 陈连清 张红 |
| 作者单位： | 湛江市第一中医医院,广东湛江,524034 |
| 摘 要： | 目的总结气压弹道碎石(PL)与体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的临床效果。方法统计分析2002年6月～2008年5月应用PL和ESWL治疗输尿管下段结石364例患者的资料。分析其病史特点、治疗方法、结石排净率和并发症等临床资料。结果PL组有效率为92.52%,ESWL组有效率为94.16%;比较两组疗效差异无显著性(p>0.05)。结论PL和ESWL都是输尿管下段结石安全、高效、微创的治疗方法。但ESWL更具有无需麻醉、非侵入性、无需住院和治疗费用低等优点,可作为输尿管下段结石的首选治疗方法。 |
| 关 键 词： | 输尿管结石 气压弹道碎石术 体外冲击波碎石术 |
COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SIDE EFFECTS OF PL AND ESWL IN TREATING DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI |
|
| Affiliation: | WANG Guang, CHEN Meifeng, WANG Lei, et al (The First CTM Hospital of Zhanjing, Zhanjing City, Guangdong Province 524034 PRC) |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate the efficacy and side effects of PL and ESWL for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. Methods To investigate the clinical material of the treatment of distal ureteral calculi for364 patients by PL and ESWL from June2002 to May2008. Results The total efficacy rate of the PL group and ESWL group were 92. 52% and 94. 16% respectively. The difference has not great significance（p 〉 0.05）. Conclusion ESWL is the first choice of treatment for patients with distal ureteral calculi than PL. |
| Keywords: | Ureteral calculi Ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |