| 细菌编码方法和Vitek-AMS对肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马筱玲,陈学民,黄尊波,李华,蹼跃晨. 细菌编码方法和Vitek-AMS对肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2000, 25(6): 462-463 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马筱玲 陈学民 黄尊波 李华 蹼跃晨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 安徽省临床检验中心,安徽,合肥,230001
2. 安徽省立医院,检验科,安徽,合肥,230001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：比较细菌编码鉴定方法与Ｖｉｔｅｋ－ＡＭＳ对肠杆图科细菌鉴定的符合率。方法：使用笔者自编的细菌鉴定编码和Ｖｉｔｅｋ－ＡＭＳ对临床分离的１２４株肠杆菌 科细菌同时进行鉴定。结果：两者鉴定结果完全符合的有１１３株,符合率为９１．１％,１１株鉴定不符合的细菌归纳为４类原因。结论：笔者自制的细菌编码鉴定系统可用于临床肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定,准确率较高,且鉴定成本大为降低。
|
| 关 键 词： | 肠杆 科 细胞编码 细菌鉴定 Vitek－AMS |
Comparison of bacteria code and Vitek-AMS for identification of 124 Enterobacteriaceae |
| |
| MA Xiao-ling,CHEN Xue-min,HUANG Zun-bo,LI Hua,PU Yue-chen. Comparison of bacteria code and Vitek-AMS for identification of 124 Enterobacteriaceae[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2000, 25(6): 462-463 |
| |
| Authors: | MA Xiao-ling CHEN Xue-min HUANG Zun-bo LI Hua PU Yue-chen |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective:To compare two methods,bacteria code and Vitek AMS,for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.Methods:The code that was made by author was evaluated in comparison with Vitek AMS by using 124 clinically isolated Enterobacteriaceae.Results:The code agreement with Vitek AMS at genus was 91.1%.The reasons of 11 disagreement isolates were classified to four kinds.Conclusions:The code demonstrated excellent accuracy and cheap cost and could be used in clinical laboratory for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. [ |
| |
| Keywords: | bacterial code enterobacteriaceae identification |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
