首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

五种检测方法在宫颈癌及其前期病变筛查中的准确性评估
引用本文:Fei HL,Cheng YF,Cheng XD,Chen XD,Ye F,Lü WG,Xie X. 五种检测方法在宫颈癌及其前期病变筛查中的准确性评估[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2011, 91(5): 309-312. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2011.05.006
作者姓名:Fei HL  Cheng YF  Cheng XD  Chen XD  Ye F  Lü WG  Xie X
作者单位:浙江大学附属妇产科医院,杭州,310006
基金项目:国家科技部"十一五"重点支撑项目,浙江省重点与高发疾病防治技术专项
摘    要:
目的 比较5种现行的筛查方法在宫颈癌高发地区的应用,从而评价出最佳宫颈癌筛查方案,进而在浙江省范围内推广.方法 在浙江省丽水市某社区内计划选取1005名年龄在25~65岁、有性生活的女性进行宫颈癌筛查,筛查手段选择巴氏涂片、液基细胞学、HPV-DNA检测法、肉眼观察辅以醋酸白染色(VIA)和肉眼观察辅以Lugol's碘染色(VILI)5种.所有筛查者均接受阴道镜检查,以病理组织学结果为金标准,阴道镜检查无异常作为阴性结果.结果 巴氏涂片对宫颈上皮内高度病变的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别如下:25%,90%,26.7%,98.6%;液基细胞学的上述指标分别为81.3%,97.3%,35.1%,99.6%;VIA上述指标为:68.9%,82.8%,7.1%,99.3%;VILI上述指标分别为:81.3%,84.6%,9.1%,99.6%;HPV-DNA检测法上述指标为:87.5%,77.3%,6.8%,99.7%.结论 液基细胞学的诊断价值好于其余4种方法,可作为宫颈癌筛查的首选方法;肉眼观察由于其简单易行,价格低廉,可适用于经济欠发达地区的普通人群的筛查.
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate five screening methods of cervical cancer so as to popularize an effective screening strategy for cervical cancer in Zhejiang province. Methods A total of 1005 women aged 25 -65 years old were selected from Lishui where cervical cancer was highly prevalent. And 859 subjects were ultimately enrolled between June 2009 and December 2009. Each subject was subjected to five screening methods, including Pap smear, liquid-based cytology (LBC), human papillomavirus DNA with a second-generation hybridization assay( HC2 ), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI). CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) 2 + on biopsy was used as the reference standard for disease positivity. Negative colposcopy was accepted as a negative outcome. Results The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)were 25%, 90%, 26.7% and 98.6% for Pap smear; 81.3%, 97.3%, 35. 1% and 99.6% for LBC;68.9%, 82. 8%, 7. 1% and 99. 3% for VIA; 81.3%, 84. 6%, 9. 1% and 99.3% for VILI; 87. 5%,77.3% and 6. 8% for HPV-DNA test respectively. Conclusions LBC is associated with a better profile of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value for five screening methods. It has the potential of optimizing the effectiveness of primary cervical cancer screening. Due to a low cost and an easy operation, VIA screening is an effective method of screening cervical cancer in the underdeveloped areas.

关 键 词:子宫颈癌  宫颈上皮内瘤样病变  细胞学  肉眼观察  HPV-DNA检测

Evaluation of five screening methods for an early detection of cervical cancer and its precancerous lesions in Zhejiang province
Fei Hua-Li,Cheng Yi-Fan,Cheng Xiao-Dong,Chen Xiao-Duan,Ye Feng,Lü Wei-Guo,Xie Xing. Evaluation of five screening methods for an early detection of cervical cancer and its precancerous lesions in Zhejiang province[J]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2011, 91(5): 309-312. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2011.05.006
Authors:Fei Hua-Li  Cheng Yi-Fan  Cheng Xiao-Dong  Chen Xiao-Duan  Ye Feng  Lü Wei-Guo  Xie Xing
Affiliation:FEI Hua-li,CHENG Yi-fan,CHENG Xiao-dong,CHEN Xiao-duan,YE Feng,L(U) Wei-guo,XIE Xing
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate five screening methods of cervical cancer so as to popularize an effective screening strategy for cervical cancer in Zhejiang province. Methods A total of 1005 women aged 25 -65 years old were selected from Lishui where cervical cancer was highly prevalent. And 859 subjects were ultimately enrolled between June 2009 and December 2009. Each subject was subjected to five screening methods, including Pap smear, liquid-based cytology (LBC), human papillomavirus DNA with a second-generation hybridization assay( HC2 ), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI). CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) 2 + on biopsy was used as the reference standard for disease positivity. Negative colposcopy was accepted as a negative outcome. Results The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)were 25%, 90%, 26.7% and 98.6% for Pap smear; 81.3%, 97.3%, 35. 1% and 99.6% for LBC;68.9%, 82. 8%, 7. 1% and 99. 3% for VIA; 81.3%, 84. 6%, 9. 1% and 99.3% for VILI; 87. 5%,77.3% and 6. 8% for HPV-DNA test respectively. Conclusions LBC is associated with a better profile of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value for five screening methods. It has the potential of optimizing the effectiveness of primary cervical cancer screening. Due to a low cost and an easy operation, VIA screening is an effective method of screening cervical cancer in the underdeveloped areas.
Keywords:Cervical cancer  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia  Cytology  Visual inspection  HPV DNA testing
本文献已被 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号