首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

四种不同配准方式对食管癌IGRT摆位误差的影响
引用本文:吴建亭,赵永亮,金建华,杭达明,刘海涛,储开岳. 四种不同配准方式对食管癌IGRT摆位误差的影响[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2016, 0(21): 3463-3465. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.21.033
作者姓名:吴建亭  赵永亮  金建华  杭达明  刘海涛  储开岳
作者单位:南通市肿瘤医院放疗科,江苏 南通 226361
基金项目:南通市科技计划项目(编号S10905;HS13940)
摘    要:
目的:研究四种不同配准方法对食管癌图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)摆位误差的影响。方法:应用瑞典医科达Synergy直线加速器治疗食管癌患者100例,每位患者治疗前用锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描。将获得的CBCT图像与计划CT图像配准,分析左右(X)、头脚(Y)、上下(Z)方向上的平移误差,比较自动灰度配准、自动灰度+手动配准、自动骨性配准、自动骨性+手动配准四种配准间的差异。结果:100例食管癌患者共进行400次配准。自动灰度配准、自动灰度+手动配准、自动骨性配准、自动骨性+手动配准在左右(X)方向的平移误差分别为(2.70±2.20)mm、(3.04±2.36)mm、(2.76±2.24)mm、(3.04±2.45)mm,在头脚(Y)方向的平移误差分别为(2.82±2.15)mm、(2.95±2.31) mm、(2.74±1.78)mm、(2.66±1.82)mm,在上下(Z)方向的平移误差分别为(2.42±1.91)mm、(2.49±2.02)mm、(3.07±2.16)mm、(2.67±2.02)mm。其中自动灰度与自动灰度+手动配准在X、Z方向差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),自动骨性与自动骨性+手动配准在X方向差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),自动灰度与自动骨性、自动灰度+手动配准与自动骨性+手动配准在X、Y、Z方向上均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对于食管癌肿瘤的图像配准,加上手动配准是有必要的,骨性配准+手动配准精度和稳定性效果更好。

关 键 词:图像配准  食管癌  CBCT  摆位误差

Comparative study on set -up errors with four different image registrations for esophageal tumor in image guided radiation therapy
Wu Jianting,Zhao Yongliang,Jin Jianhua,Hang Daming,Liu Haitao,Chu Kaiyue. Comparative study on set -up errors with four different image registrations for esophageal tumor in image guided radiation therapy[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2016, 0(21): 3463-3465. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2016.21.033
Authors:Wu Jianting  Zhao Yongliang  Jin Jianhua  Hang Daming  Liu Haitao  Chu Kaiyue
Affiliation:Department of Radiotherapy,Nantong Tumor Hospital,Jiangsu Nantong 226361,China.
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate four different image registrations for esophageal tumor in image guided radia-tion therapy.Methods:All 100 esophageal tumor patients were treated by the Elekta Synergy IGRT system,compare the difference between CBCT images and planning CT images in Automatic grey -value registration,Automatic grey -value +Manual registration,Automatic bone registration,Automatic bone +Manual registration.Results:Total of 400 CBCT images were registrated for 100 esophageal tumor patients.The set -up errors on X -axis ofAutomatic grey -val-ue registration,Automatic grey -value +Manual registration,Automatic bone registration,Automatic bone +Manual registration were (2.70 ±2.20)mm,(3.04 ±2.36)mm,(2.76 ±2.24)mm,(3.04 ±2.45)mm respectively.The set -up errors on Y -axis were (2.82 ±2.15)mm,(2.95 ±2.31)mm,(2.74 ±1.78)mm,(2.66 ±1.82)mm re-spectively.The set -up errors on Z -axis were (2.42 ±1.91)mm,(2.49 ±2.02)mm,(3.07 ±2.16)mm,(2.67 ± 2.02)mm respectively.There was significant difference between Automatic grey -value registration and Automatic grey -value +Manual registration in X -axis,Z -axis(P <0.05),there was significant difference between Automatic bone registration and Automatic bone +Manual registration in X -axis(P <0.05),there was no significant difference between Automatic grey -value registration and Automatic bone registration,Automatic grey -value +Manual regis-tration and Automatic bone +Manual registration in X,Y,Z -axis(P >0.05).Conclusion:It is suggested that Auto-matic bone +Manual registration may be the best solution to reduce the set -up errors for esophageal tumor in IGRT.
Keywords:image registration  esophageal tumor  cone beam computed tomography  set -up error
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号