首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

三种不同术后镇痛方案应用于腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床效果观察
引用本文:吴靦,李宇琴,吴演文,蒋红娥,谭美云,刁胜翠,张春元.三种不同术后镇痛方案应用于腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床效果观察[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2022,47(3):330-333.
作者姓名:吴靦  李宇琴  吴演文  蒋红娥  谭美云  刁胜翠  张春元
作者单位:1.南方医科大学附属中山市博爱医院 麻醉科,广东 中山 5284032.广东省中山市中医院 内二科,528400
基金项目:计划生育局医学科研项目;广东省中山市卫生
摘    要:目的比较3种不同术后镇痛方案在腹腔镜全子宫切除术中的应用效果。方法选择择期行腹腔镜下全子宫切除术病人90例为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为地佐辛复合曲马多组(DT组)、地佐辛复合氟比洛芬酯组(DF组)、地佐辛复合舒芬太尼组(DS组),各30例。DT、DF、DS组分别采用地佐辛0.5 mg/kg+曲马多10 mg/kg、地佐辛0.5 mg/kg+氟比洛芬酯3 mg/kg、地佐辛0.5 mg/kg+舒芬太尼1 μg/kg行术后静脉自控镇痛(PCIA),维持VAS评分≤3分,若VAS > 3分,单次追加地佐辛0.1 mg/kg。记录病人术后2、4、8、12、24 h的Ramsay镇静评分、BCS舒适度评分;记录病人PCIA地佐辛用量、额外追加地佐辛用量、PCIA次数;记录术后肠鸣音恢复时间、首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、恶心、呕吐、腹胀、头晕发生情况。结果与DT、DS组比较,DF组术后肠鸣音恢复时间、首次肛门排气时间、首次下床活动时间均缩短(P < 0.05),术后恶心、呕吐、腹胀及头晕发生率均降低(P < 0.05)。3组病人术后2、4、8、12、24 h各时点的Ramsay镇静评分、BCS舒适度评分间差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);3组病人PCIA的地佐辛用量、额外追加地佐辛用量、自控镇痛次数差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论地佐辛复合氟比洛芬酯在满足病人术后镇痛的基础上,更有利于胃肠功能的恢复。

关 键 词:全子宫切除术    麻醉    术后镇痛    腹腔镜    地佐辛
收稿时间:2019-10-15

Application effects of three different postoperative analgesic regimens in laparoscopic total hysterectomy
WU Mian,LI Yu-qin,WU Yan-wen,JIANG Hong-e,TAN Mei-yun,DIAO Sheng-cui,ZHANG Chun-yuan.Application effects of three different postoperative analgesic regimens in laparoscopic total hysterectomy[J].Journal of Bengbu Medical College,2022,47(3):330-333.
Authors:WU Mian  LI Yu-qin  WU Yan-wen  JIANG Hong-e  TAN Mei-yun  DIAO Sheng-cui  ZHANG Chun-yuan
Institution:1.Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Boai Hospital of Zhongshan, Southern Medical University, Zhongshan Guangdong 5284032.Internal Medicine 2 Area, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan Guangdong 528400, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of three different postoperative analgesic regimens in laparoscopic total hysterectomy.MethodsNinety patients scheduled by laparoscopic total hysterectomy were randomly divided into the dezocine combined with tramadol group(DT group), dezocine combined with flurbiprofen axetil group(DF group) and dezocine combined with sufentanil group(DS group)(30 cases in each group). The DT, DF and DS groups were treated with 0.5 mg/kg dezocine+10 mg/kg tramadol, 0.5 mg/kg dezocine+3 mg/kg flurbiprofen axetil and 0.5 mg/kg dezocine+1 μg/kg sufentanil for postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA), respectively. The VAS score ≤3 points was maintained.If VAS score > 3 points, the 0.1 mg/kg dizocine was added in a single dose. The Ramsay sedation score and BCS comfort score among three groups were recorded after 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h of surgery. The dose of dezocine, dose of additional dezocine, number of PCIA, postoperative bowel sounds recovery time, first anal exhaust time, first time out of bed activity, nausea, vomiting, bloating and dizziness among three groups were recorded.ResultsCompared with the DT group and DS group, the postoperative bowel sound recovery time, first anal exhaust time and first time of getting out of bed activity were significantly shortened(P < 0.05), and the postoperative nausea, abdominal distension and dizziness significantly reduced in the DF group(P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in Ramsay sedation score and BCS comfort score among three groups after 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h of surgery, and the differences of the dose of dezocine, dose of additional dezocine and number of PCIA were not statistically significant(P > 0.05).ConclusionsDezoxin combined with flurbiprofen axetil is more beneficial to the recovery of gastrointestinal function on the basis of satisfying postoperative analgesia.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《蚌埠医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《蚌埠医学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号