| 手指部分缺失两种重建方法的疗效比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱小波宋朝骏,袁启智黄硕麟 陈玉林. 手指部分缺失两种重建方法的疗效比较[J]. 上海预防医学, 2000, 12(7): 323-324 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱小波宋朝骏 袁启智黄硕麟 陈玉林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]上海市第七人民医院烧伤疤痕手功能治疗中心,上海200137 [2]上海市第一人民医院,上海200080 [3]上海市长海医院,上海200433 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 上海市浦东新区特色学科课题 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 比较手指缺失两种重建方法的疗效。 [方法 ] 以 1996年以前用皮管植骨法重建手指 10例。1996年后用拔伸延长术重建手指 5例。 [结果 ] 术后随访 6月 ,拔伸延长术 5例 ,在外形、皮肤的感觉及血运方面明显优于皮管植骨法。 [结论 ] 在手指重建时 ,在基层单位应首选拔伸牵引延长术。
|
| 关 键 词： | 手指 缺失 拔伸延长术 再造 |
Comparing the treatment effects of two kinds of reconstructed methods in finger scarcity |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective] To compare the treatment effects of two kinds of reconstructed methods in finger scarcity partly.[Method] before 1996, we reconstructed finger scarcity with tubal flap of bone-transplantation for 10 cases. From 1996 to this year, fingers were reconstructed by using the method of extension in 5 cases.[Results] following 6 months after operation, the method of extension in 5 cases was much better than the tubal flap of bone-transplantation in feeling of jagged, skin and blood transport.[Conclusion] the skeleton hospital should choose extension first when we carry through the reconstruction of the fingers. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
