首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种手术方法治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效比较
引用本文:刘佃温,陈俊,陈淑君. 两种手术方法治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国肛肠病杂志, 2010, 0(10): 23-24
作者姓名:刘佃温  陈俊  陈淑君
作者单位:河南中医学院第一附属医院肛肠科,河南郑州450008
摘    要:
为比较重建皮肤黏膜桥术和单纯外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效,将90例环状混合痔患者随机分为两组,各45例,一组采用重建皮肤黏膜桥术治疗(治疗组),一组采用单纯外剥内扎术治疗(对照组)。结果显示,在治愈率方面,两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);在创面愈合方面,治疗绀明显快于对照组(P〈0.01).且术后并发症发生率及复发率比对照组低。结果表明.重建皮肤黏膜桥术治疗环状混合痔安全有效,疗效优于单纯外剥内扎术。

关 键 词:环状混合痔  重建皮肤黏膜桥术  外剥内扎术  对比分析

Comparison on the Clinical Therapeutic Efficacy of Two Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Circumferential Mixed Hemorrhoids
LIU Dian-wen,CHEN Jun,CHEN Shu-jun. Comparison on the Clinical Therapeutic Efficacy of Two Surgical Procedures in the Treatment of Circumferential Mixed Hemorrhoids[J]. , 2010, 0(10): 23-24
Authors:LIU Dian-wen  CHEN Jun  CHEN Shu-jun
Affiliation:( Dept. of Coloproctology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan College of TCM, Zhengzhou, Henan 450008)
Abstract:
The objective of the study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of two surgical procedures:reconstruction of skin and mucosal bridge(RSMB) and external dissection and internal ligation(EDIL) in the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids(CMH). Ninety patients with CMH were randomised into two groups,patients in the study group( n=45) underwent RSMB,while patients in the control group( n =45) underwent EDII.. As results,there was no statistical difference in cure rate between the two groups( P 〉0.05) ;while wound healing was quicker in the study group than in the control group ( P 〈0.01) ,and postoperative complication incidence rate and recurrence rate were lower in the study group. It is concluded that RSMB is safe and effective in the treatment of CMH,better than EDIL.
Keywords:Circumferential mixed hemorrhoid  Reconstruction of skin and mucosal bridge  External dissection and internal ligation  Comparative analysis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号