首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同追踪方式对射波刀治疗肺肿瘤近期疗效的影响
引用本文:庄洪卿,袁智勇,宋勇春,董洋,李丰彤,王境生,王平. 不同追踪方式对射波刀治疗肺肿瘤近期疗效的影响[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2013, 22(1): 36-38. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2013.01.011
作者姓名:庄洪卿  袁智勇  宋勇春  董洋  李丰彤  王境生  王平
作者单位:300060 天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科 天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室天津市肺癌诊疗中心
摘    要:
目的 探讨金标、椎体实时追踪对射波刀治疗肺部肿瘤近期疗效的影响。
方法 回顾分析射波刀治疗肺部肿瘤患者 64例72个病灶,其中原发瘤 40例41个病灶,转移瘤 24例31个病灶。45个病灶采用金标追踪,27例患者采用椎体追踪。70%~94%(中位数80%)等剂量线覆盖计划把体积,照射剂量60 Gy分3次。比较两者近期疗效与追踪方式的关系。
结果 全部病灶有效率金标追踪好于椎体追踪(93%∶74%,χ2=6.84,P=0.033),下肺病灶的也如此(15%∶7%,χ2=7.18,P=0.028),但上肺病灶的两者相似(28%∶12%,χ2=2.36,P=0.310),治疗体积<15 cm3金标追踪好于椎体追踪(25%∶12%,χ2=6.53,P=0.038),而≥15 cm3的两者相似(17%∶8%,χ2=1.57,P=0.460)。全部病灶椎体追踪治疗失败率比金标追踪高(19%∶2%,χ2=6.33,P=0.021)。
结论 不同追踪方式与射波刀治疗肺部肿瘤近期疗效有关,并受病灶位置、治疗体积影响。

关 键 词:肺部肿瘤  放射疗法  放射疗法  射波刀  金标追踪  椎体追踪  近期疗效  
收稿时间:2012-04-26

Impacts of different tracking methods on short-term therapeutic effect of cyberknife in treatment of lung cancer
ZHUANG Hong-qing , YUAN Zhi-yong , SONG Yong-chun , DONG Yang , LI Feng-tong , WANG Jing-sheng , WANG Ping. Impacts of different tracking methods on short-term therapeutic effect of cyberknife in treatment of lung cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2013, 22(1): 36-38. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2013.01.011
Authors:ZHUANG Hong-qing    YUAN Zhi-yong    SONG Yong-chun    DONG Yang    LI Feng-tong    WANG Jing-sheng    WANG Ping
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical university, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, ChinaCorresponding author:YUAN Zhi-yong, Email:zhiyong0524@163.com
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the impacts of fiducial tracking and X-sight tracking on the short-term therapeutic effect of cybernikife in the treatment of lung cancer.
Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on 64 lung cancer patients (72 lesions), including 40 primary tumor patients (41 lesions) and 24 metastatic tumor patients (31 lesions), who were treated with cyberknife. Fiducial tracking was used for 45 lesions, while X-sight tracking was used for 27 lesions. The planning target volume was covered by 70%—94%(median 80%) isodose contour. The irradiation dose was 60 Gy/3 fractions. The relationship between short-term therapeutic effect and tracking method was determined.
Results Overall, the lesions undergoing fiducial tracking showed significantly higher response rate than those undergoing X-sight tracking (93% vs. 74%, χ2=6.84,P=0.033), and so was in lower lung lesions (15% vs. 7%, χ2=7.18,P=0.028). But the two tracking methods achieved similar effects in upper lung lesions (28% vs. 12%, χ2=2.36,P=0.310). In the lesions with treatment volumes smaller than 15 cm3, the fiducial tracking achieved significantly higher response rate than the X-sight tracking (25% vs. 12%, χ2=6.53,P=0.038), but the two tracking methods achieved similar effects in the lesions with treatment volumes not smaller than 15 cm3(17% vs 8%, χ2=1.57,P=0.460). Overall, the lesions undergoing X-sight tracking had significantlyhigher treatment failure rate than fiducial tracking (19% vs. 2%, χ2=6.33,P=0.021).
Conclusions Different tracking methods may lead to different therapeutic effects of cyberknife in the treatment of lung cancer, which are related to lesion location and treatment volume.
Keywords:Lung neoplasms / radiotherapy  Radiotherapy,cyberknife  Synchrony tracking  Spine tracking  Early effects
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号