Regurgitant Volume/Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Ratio: Prognostic Value in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation |
| |
Authors: | Farnaz Namazi Pieter van der Bijl Federico Fortuni Bart J.A. Mertens Vasileios Kamperidis Suzanne E. van Wijngaarden Gregg W. Stone Jagat Narula Nina Ajmone Marsan Alec Vahanian Victoria Delgado Jeroen J. Bax |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands;2. Department of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Cardiology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy;3. Bioinformatics Center of Expertise, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands;4. The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA;5. The Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai St. Luke''s and Mount Sinai West, New York, New York, USA;6. University of Paris VII, Paris, France;7. INSERM U, Paris, France |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic implications of the ratio of mitral regurgitant volume (RVol) to left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV) in patients with significant secondary mitral regurgitation (MR).BackgroundQuantification of secondary MR remains challenging, and its severity can be over- or underestimated when using the proximal isovelocity surface area method, which does not take LV volume into account. This limitation can be addressed by normalizing mitral RVol to LVEDV.MethodsA total of 379 patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years; 63% male) with significant (moderate and severe) secondary MR were divided into 2 groups according to the RVol/EDV ratio: RVol/EDV ≥20% (greater MR/smaller EDV) and <20% (smaller MR/larger EDV). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.ResultsDuring median (interquartile range) follow-up of 50 (26 to 94) months, 199 (52.5%) patients died. When considering patients receiving medical therapy only, patients with RVol/EDV ratio ≥20% tended to have higher mortality rates than those with RVol/EDV ratio <20% (5-year estimated rates 24.1% vs. 18.4%, respectively; p = 0.077). Conversely, when considering the entire follow-up period including mitral valve interventions, patients with a higher RVol/EDV ratio (≥20%) had lower rates of all-cause mortality compared with patients with RVol/EDV ratio <20% (5-year estimated rates 39.0% vs. 44.8%, respectively; p = 0.018). On multivariable analysis, higher RVol/EDV ratio (per 5% increment as a continuous variable) was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality (0.93; p = 0.023).ConclusionsIn patients with significant secondary MR treated medically, survival tended to be lower in those with a higher RVol/EDV ratio. Conversely, a higher RVol/EDV ratio was independently associated with reduced all-cause mortality. when mitral valve interventions were taken into consideration |
| |
Keywords: | prognosis regurgitant volume secondary mitral regurgitation CI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0030" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" confidence interval CMR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0040" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" cardiac magnetic resonance EDV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0050" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" end-diastolic volume EF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0060" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" ejection fraction EROA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0070" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" effective regurgitant orifice area ESV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0080" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" end-systolic volume HF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0090" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" heart failure HR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0100" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" hazard ratio IQR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0110" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" interquartile range LV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0120" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" left ventricle LVEDV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0130" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" left ventricular end-diastolic volume LVESV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0140" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" left ventricular end-systolic volume MR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0150" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" mitral regurgitation MV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0160" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" mitral valve NYHA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0170" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" New York Heart Association PISA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0180" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" proximal isovelocity surface area RF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0190" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" regurgitant fraction RVol" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0200" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" regurgitant volume SV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0210" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" stroke volume |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|