首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

272例FDA医疗器械产品一级召回事件分析和探讨
引用本文:文强,夏世韬,钟玲,等. 272例FDA医疗器械产品一级召回事件分析和探讨[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2014, 0(4): 235-240
作者姓名:文强  夏世韬  钟玲  
作者单位:[1]重庆市药品不良反应监测中心,重庆400014 [2]重庆大学生物工程学院,重庆400044
摘    要:
目的通过对272例FDA医疗器械产品一级召回事件进行分类统计分析,探讨严重医疗器械风险事件的发生规律,为上市后医疗器械风险管理工作提供参考。方法检索2001—2012年FDA官网发布的最严重的医疗器械产品一级召回事件,对其中不涉及假劣、伪造等非法原因的272个事件案例进行分类统计和分析。结果构成比排前10位的产品种类占到90%的事件数量;能量型危害是主要危害形式,占79.4%;产品组件失效是最主要的直接原因,占76.1%。结论从产品的角度,严重医疗器械风险事件的产生主要与应用部分、组件可靠性及其功能、能量控制、可用性等主要因素有关。

关 键 词:医疗器械  召回  风险管理

Analysis and Discussion of 272 Cases of Class I Medical Device Recalls by FDA
WEN Qiang,XIA Shi-tao,ZHONG Ling,ZHONG Dai-di,MIAO Yu. Analysis and Discussion of 272 Cases of Class I Medical Device Recalls by FDA[J]. Chinese JOurnal of Pharmacovigilance, 2014, 0(4): 235-240
Authors:WEN Qiang  XIA Shi-tao  ZHONG Ling  ZHONG Dai-di  MIAO Yu
Affiliation:1Center for ADR Monitoring of Chongqing, Chongqing 400014, China; 2Bioengineering College of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the occurrence of serious medical device risks and provide reference for the post-marketing medical device risk management through statistical analysis on 272 cases of FDA class I medical device recalls. Methods Statistical analysis is applied to the retrieval of 2001-2012 the most serious class I medical device recalls from FDA website which does not involve the cases caused by illegal factors. Results The constituent ratio of the top 10 categories of products accounts for 90% of the number of cases. Energy hazard is the main form, accounting for 79.4%. The product component failure is the main direct reason, accounting for 76.1%. Conclusion Serious medical device risks are mainly related to applied part, component reliability and function, energy control, usability, etc.
Keywords:medical device  recall  risk management
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号