全凭静脉麻醉与静吸复合麻醉效果比较

目的：探讨全凭静脉麻醉与静吸复合麻醉的临床麻醉效果,从而为寻找更安全的麻醉方法提供依据。方法：选取2010年1～12月采用全凭静脉麻醉进行择期手术患者98例作为观察组,选取同期静吸复合麻醉择期手术98例患者作为对照组,比较两组血流动力学变化、术毕呼之睁眼时间、麻醉清醒后患者对术中疼痛的回忆、术后24h不良反应发生情况。结果：观察组术中心率为（75±9）次／min,低于本组诱导前心率[（83±9）次／min]及对照组术中心率[（80±8）次／min],差异有统计学意义（P〈O．05）;观察组不良反应为烦躁2例（2．04％）、恶心2例（2．04％）,低于对照组[7例（7．14％）、9例（9．18％）1,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;其他观察指标比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：全凭静脉麻醉与静吸复合麻醉比较,其可控性、麻醉效果均较好,且不良反应发生率低于静吸复合麻醉。

Anesthesia effect comparison between total intravenous anesthesia and intravenous-inhalation anesthesia

Objective: To investigate the clinical anesthesia effect of the total intravenous anesthesia and intravenous-inhalation anesthesia,in order to seek more safer anesthesia method.Methods: 98 cases of patients with total intravenous anesthesia were treated as the observation group from January to December 2010,and 98 cases with intravenous-inhalation anesthesia were treated as the control group at the same time.Then the hemodynamic changes,eyes opening time,recalling of pain,adverse reaction in 24 h of the two...