Charlson score as a single pertinent criterion to select candidates for active surveillance among patients with small renal masses |
| |
Authors: | François Audenet Marie Audouin Sarah J. Drouin Eva Comperat Pierre Mozer Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler Arnaud Méjean Olivier Cussenot Shahrokh F. Shariat Morgan Rouprêt |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. AP-HP, Academic Urology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 83 bvd de l’H?pital, 75013, Paris, France 2. AP-HP, Service d’Urologie, H?pital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015, Paris, France 3. UPMC Université Paris 06, GRC5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, 75005, Paris, France 4. Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
|
| |
Abstract: |
Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) of patients with small renal masses (SRMs) who would have been eligible for active surveillance (AS). Methods Data were collected retrospectively for 758 patients who underwent NSS over a 5-year period. Outcomes were assessed in two groups of patients who were eligible for AS according to different criteria. Group 1 criteria were as follows: age >75 years, renal mass ≤4 cm, significant comorbidities [Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) >2]. Group 2 criteria were as follows: any SRM ≤ 4 cm regardless of age, severe comorbidities with a 10-year mortality risk >50 % (CCI > 4). The two groups were not compared statistically because some patients were included in both. Results Fifty-five patients (7.3 %) were included in Group 1 and 62 (8.2 %) in Group 2. There was a significant proportion of benign tumours in Group 1 (N = 6; 11 %) and Group 2 (N = 6; 10 %). Six (11 %) positive margins were observed in Group 1 and 8 (13 %) in Group 2. The 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100 and 77.4 %, respectively, in Group 1, and 88.5 and 79.6 % in Group 2. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 100 and 74.7 % in Group 1, and 96.7 and 78.1 % in Group 2. Conclusions The majority of patients with SRMs who would have been eligible for AS had no recurrence after initial tumour removal. In these patients, a CCI > 4 appeared to be a pertinent criterion to identify those patients less likely to benefit from immediate surgery. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|