|
|||||
|
|
| 认知能力筛查测验C-2.0在成都地区老年人群应用的信度和效度 | |
| 引用本文： | 陆蓉,罗祖明,刘协和. 认知能力筛查测验C-2.0在成都地区老年人群应用的信度和效度[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2000, 8(2): 70-72 |
| 作者姓名： | 陆蓉 罗祖明 刘协和 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南京脑科医院,南京,210029 2. 华西医科大学附一院,成都,610041 |
| 摘 要： | 评价CASIC - 2 0量表的信度和效度。方法 :对 80 7名老年人进行认知能力检查。结果 :CASIC - 2 0具有良好的信度 ,在效度方面 ,其敏感性与MMSE相当 ;特异性高于MMSE。结论 :CASIC - 2 0具有良好的信度和效度 ,值得推广应用。 |
| 关 键 词： | 认知能力筛查测验 信度 效度 |
The Reliability and Validity of Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument C-2.0 Used in Elderly People in Chengdu |
|
| LU Rong,LUO Zhuming,LIU Xiehe. The Reliability and Validity of Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument C-2.0 Used in Elderly People in Chengdu[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2000, 8(2): 70-72 | |
| Authors: | LU Rong LUO Zhuming LIU Xiehe |
| Abstract: | To assess the reliability and validity of Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument C-2.0 (CASI C-2.0). Methods:807 persons aged from 55 to 100 years were evaluated with CASI C-2.0. Results:CASI C-2.0 has excellent reliability. On validity, comparing with MMSE, CASI C-2.0 has a better specificity, and a same sensitivity. Conclusion: CASI C-2.0 has excellent reliability and validity. It is worthy to be applied for both clinical and epidemiological surveys |
| Keywords: | Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) Reliability Validity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |