Peribulbar anaesthesia: a double-blind comparison of three local anaesthetic solutions |
| |
Authors: | Bedi A Carabine U |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Belfast, UK. |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() A prospective, randomised, double-blinded study comparing three agents for peribulbar anaesthesia is reported. Sixty patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction under local anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive peribulbar anaesthesia with lignocaine 2% with adrenaline; prilocaine 3% with felypressin 0.03 IU.ml-1 or 2% lignocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in a ratio of 1:1, using a standardised two-injection technique. The pain of injection, time of onset of the block and the operating conditions at the start and finish of surgery were assessed. Peribulbar anaesthesia using lignocaine 2% was significantly more painful than the other solutions. The onset of anaesthesia adequate for surgery was similar in all three groups. Prilocaine 3% with felypressin was associated with the greatest number of blocks providing total akinesia of the eye. Inadequate duration of anaesthesia was seen in only one case; the solution used for this block was 2% lignocaine. |
| |
Keywords: | Anaesthetics, local prilocaine, lignocaine, bupivacaine Anaesthetic techniques, regional peribulbar |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|