A Prospective Study of In-line Skating: Observational Series and Survey of Active In-line Skaters—Injuries, Protective Equipment, and Training

Objectives: 1) To assess the relationship between types of injuries incurred and training and protective equipment worn by adults injured while in–line skating; 2) to observe the type and amount of protective equipment worn by in–line skaters while skating; and 3) to survey active in–line skaters about formal training, protective equipment, and history of injuries incurred, and the effect of such injuries on the protective equipment subsequently worn. Methods: A prospective study of consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED for evaluation of in–line skating injuries; a consecutive–series observational study of active in–line skaters to assess protective equipment worn; and a survey of selected active in–line skaters. Eighty–five adult patients were included who presented with a history of injury related to in–line skating to the EDs of an urban academic medical center, a suburban academic–affiliated hospital, and a community hospital. Four hundred eleven active in–line skaters on the Chicago lakefront were observed for protective equipment worn, 91 of whom participated in the survey. Results: Of those presenting to the ED with injuries, only 15% indicated that they had received formal inline skating instruction. Of the ED patients, 50% wore no protective equipment; overall, 6% wore a helmet; 44%, wrist protection; 23%, knee protection; and 19%, elbow protection. Only 2% wore all of the above equipment. The primary mechanism of injury reported was a loss of balance (58%); others included collision with objects (25%), collision with bicycles (11%), and collision with cars (5%). Fractures or dislocations occurred in 48% of the patients; 6% had head injuries necessitating CT scans. Those who wore no protective gear were more likely to require hospital admission (p < 0.05). Of the 411 in–line skaters observed, 157 (38%) wore no protective equipment. Compared with the injured group presenting to the ED, fewer observed participants were without protection (p < 0.(35). Among those surveyed, prior injury was not associated with the subsequent use of protective gear. Conclusion: Patients who present to the ED for evaluation of in–line skating injuries have a high incidence of fractures/dislocations. Few injured or surveyed in–line skaters had formal training. Use of protective equipment by injured skaters was associated with a decreased likelihood of hospitalization. Observed in–line skaters more commonly wore protective gear than did those who presented to the ED with injuries.