| 《伤寒》《金匮》医方考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张灿玾,张增敏. 《伤寒》《金匮》医方考[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2004, 38(2): 3-5 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张灿玾 张增敏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东中医药大学,山东,济南,250014;山东中医药大学,山东,济南,250014 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 依据历代文献资料,对林亿等校定的《伤寒论》序中所载方之总数为“一百一十二方”、《金匮要略》序中所录“二百六十二方”加以考证。并分析《伤寒杂病论》的桂林本和长沙本的版本异同、医方特点等,认为两种版本《伤寒杂病论》均系后人有意托古所作,非仲景之旧物。
|
| 关 键 词： | <伤寒论><金匮要略><伤寒杂病论>桂林本 长沙本 考证 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-1334(2004)02-0003-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-07-30 |
Textual Criticism of Herbal Prescriptions in Treatise on Exogenous Febrile Disease and Synopsis of Golden Cabinet |
| |
| ZHANG Chan-jia ZHANG Zeng-minShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Textual Criticism of Herbal Prescriptions in Treatise on Exogenous Febrile Disease and Synopsis of Golden Cabinet[J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2004, 38(2): 3-5 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Chan-jia ZHANG Zeng-minShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Chan-jia ZHANG Zeng-minShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine |
| |
| Abstract: | On the basis of previous medical literature, the paper studies the numbers of the herbal prescriptions in Treatise on Exogenous Febrile Disease and Synopsis of Golden Cabinet, and the editions and contents of the former book, and concludes that the former book was written by other people, not by Zhang Zhongjing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Treatise on Exogenous Febrile Disease Synopsis of Golden Cabinet textual criticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
