Complete ascertainment of intragenic copy number mutations (CNMs) in the CFTR gene and its implications for CNM formation at other autosomal loci |
| |
Authors: | Sylvia Quemener Jian‐Min Chen Nadia Chuzhanova Caroline Bénech Teresa Casals Milan Macek Jr. Thierry Bienvenu Trudi McDevitt Philip M. Farrell Ourida Loumi Taieb Messaoud Harry Cuppens Garry R. Cutting Peter D. Stenson Karine Giteau Marie‐Pierre Audrézet David N. Cooper Claude Férec |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U613, Brest, France;2. Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale (UBO), Brest, France;3. Etablissement Fran?ais du Sang (EFS)—Bretagne, Brest, France;4. Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire et d'Histocompatibilité, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), H?pital Morvan, Brest, France;5. School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, United Kingdom;6. Medical and Molecular Genetics Center‐IDIBELL, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain;7. Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics‐Cystic Fibrosis Center, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;8. Laboratoire de Biochimie et Génétique Moléculaire, H?pital Cochin, Paris, France;9. National Centre for Medical Genetics and Department of Paediatrics, University College Dublin, Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children, Dublin, Ireland;10. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI;11. Faculté des Sciences Biologiques, Bab‐Ezzouar Institut de Biologie, Université des Sciences et de la Technologie, Alger, Algeria;12. Laboratoire de Biochimie, Clinique‐Hopital d'Enfants, Tunis, Tunisia;13. Center for Human Genetics, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;14. Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;15. Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | Over the last 20 years since the discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, more than 1,600 different putatively pathological CFTR mutations have been identified. Until now, however, copy number mutations (CNMs) involving the CFTR gene have not been methodically analyzed, resulting almost certainly in the underascertainment of CFTR gene duplications compared with deletions. Here, high‐resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (averaging one interrogating probe every 95 bp) was used to analyze the entire length of the CFTR gene (189 kb) in 233 cystic fibrosis chromosomes lacking conventional mutations. We succeeded in identifying five duplication CNMs that would otherwise have been refractory to analysis. Based upon findings from this and other studies, we propose that deletion and duplication CNMs in the human autosomal genome are likely to be generated in the proportion of approximately 2–3:1. We further postulate that intragenic gene duplication CNMs in other disease loci may have been routinely underascertained. Finally, our analysis of ±20 bp flanking each of the 40 CFTR breakpoints characterized at the DNA sequence level provide support for the emerging concept that non‐B DNA conformations in combination with specific sequence motifs predispose to both recurring and nonrecurring genomic rearrangements. Hum Mutat 31:1–8, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | CFTR copy number mutation CNM copy number variation CNV deletion duplication CGH |
|
|