Characterization of aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) mutations in familial isolated pituitary adenoma families |
| |
Authors: | Susana Igreja Harvinder S. Chahal Peter King Graeme B. Bolger Umasuthan Srirangalingam Leonardo Guasti J. Paul Chapple Giampaolo Trivellin Maria Gueorguiev Katie Guegan Karen Stals Bernard Khoo Ajith V. Kumar Sian Ellard Ashley B. Grossman Márta Korbonits and the International FIPA Consortium |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Endocrinology, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom;2. Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama;3. Department of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom;4. Department of Endocrinology, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom;5. North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) is an autosomal dominant condition with variable genetic background and incomplete penetrance. Germline mutations of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene have been reported in 15–40% of FIPA patients. Limited data are available on the functional consequences of the mutations or regarding the regulation of the AIP gene. We describe a large cohort of FIPA families and characterize missense and silent mutations using minigene constructs, luciferase and β‐galactosidase assays, as well as in silico predictions. Patients with AIP mutations had a lower mean age at diagnosis (23.6±11.2 years) than AIP mutation‐negative patients (40.4±14.5 years). A promoter mutation showed reduced in vitro activity corresponding to lower mRNA expression in patient samples. Stimulation of the protein kinase A‐pathway positively regulates the AIP promoter. Silent mutations led to abnormal splicing resulting in truncated protein or reduced AIP expression. A two‐hybrid assay of protein–protein interaction of all missense variants showed variable disruption of AIP‐phosphodiesterase‐4A5 binding. In summary, exonic, promoter, splice‐site, and large deletion mutations in AIP are implicated in 31% of families in our FIPA cohort. Functional characterization of AIP changes is important to identify the functional impact of gene sequence variants. Hum Mutat 31:1–11, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | pituitary adenoma FIPA acromegaly AIP tumor suppressor |
|
|