明胶海绵条与明胶海绵颗粒在栓塞子宫动脉治疗切口妊娠中的疗效对比研究

目的 探讨明胶海绵2种栓塞剂型栓塞子宫动脉后清宫治疗子宫切口妊娠疗效对比.方法 收集本院94例确诊为子宫切口妊娠患者的临床资料,按照栓塞方式的不同,将其分为明胶海绵颗粒栓塞组(49例)和明胶海绵条栓塞组(45例).分别对其清宫术中总出血量、介入术后疼痛程度、介入手术费用、β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-HCG)降至正常的时间进行对比.结果 明胶海绵条栓塞组在术后患者疼痛程度、介入手术费用方面明显优于明胶海绵颗粒栓塞组,而在清宫术中总出血量、β-HCG降至正常的时间差异无统计学意义.结论 用明胶海绵条代替明胶海绵颗粒栓塞子宫动脉后行清宫术治疗切口妊娠可以显著降低患者介入术后疼痛,降低患者手术费用,值得临床推广.

Compare gelatin sponge strip with gelatin sponge particles in the uterine arterial embolization of cesarean scar pregnancy

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy compared with gelatin sponge strip and gelatin sponge particles as an embolic agent.Methods A retrospective study was performed of 94 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy, and they were divided into two groups randomly.The embolic agent in experimental group was gelatin sponge strip and gelatin sponge particles were used in control group.All the cases underwent curettage operation after UAE.The mean amount of bleeding loss during curettage operation, abdominal pain degree after UAE procedure, UAE costs and time of recovery to the normal level of blood β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) were compared between two groups.Results The mean amount of bleeding loss during curettage operation and time of recovery to the normal level of blood β-HCG were no statistical differences compared with the two groups, but the abdominal pain degree after UAE procedure and UAE costs in experimental group were lower than in control group, there were significant statistical differences compared with the two groups.Conclusion Gelatin sponge strip as an embolic agent in the UAE procedure of cesarean scar pregnancy could reduce post-operative pain and the cost, which is worthy of clinical promotion.