首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种排龈方法排龈效果的数字化分析
引用本文:杨贝贝,郜珍燕,安虹,王丽媛. 两种排龈方法排龈效果的数字化分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(7): 618-622. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.07.009
作者姓名:杨贝贝  郜珍燕  安虹  王丽媛
作者单位:1. 西安交通大学口腔医院2.
基金项目:西安交通大学口腔医院新技术
摘    要:
目的 数字化分析比较半导体激光排龈及单线排龈法的临床排龈效果,即排龈疼痛度分析以及对游离龈龈沟宽度(sulcus width,SW)和牙龈退缩量(gingival recession,GR)的影响.方法 选择需行固定修复的患者42例,共计52颗患牙,随机分为半导体激光排龈组及单线排龈组,选择26颗正常牙作为空白对照组....

关 键 词:单线排龈  半导体激光  龈沟宽度  牙龈退缩
收稿时间:2020-06-30

Digital analysis of gingival retraction effects following two methods
YANG Beibei,GAO Zhenyan,AN Hong,WANG Liyuan. Digital analysis of gingival retraction effects following two methods[J]. Stomatology, 2021, 41(7): 618-622. DOI: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2021.07.009
Authors:YANG Beibei  GAO Zhenyan  AN Hong  WANG Liyuan
Abstract:
Objective To apply digital analysis to compare the clinical gingival retraction effects, including gingival pain degree, sulcus width (SW) and gingival recession (GR), between diode laser method and single cord method. Methods A total of 52 teeth were selected from 42 patients who needed fixed partial denture restoration. They were randomly divided into two groups, diode laser gingival retraction group and single cord gingival retraction group. Twenty six normal teeth were selected as blank control group. VRS digital pain grading method was used to evaluate the pain degree of the two gingival retraction methods, and 3shape scanner was chosen to rebuild digital models before and after gingival retraction at the time point of 0 week, 1st week and 6th week. Finally, the acquired data was input into geomagic qualify 2014 software to compare the gingival effects SW, GR0, GR1 and GR6 before and after gingival displacement. Results The pain level of the diode laser group was lower than that of the single cord group (P<0.05); the SW of diode laser group (buccal (0.394 2±0.087 3)mm, palatal (0.397 4±0.086 8)mm) was greater than the single cord group (buccal (0.322 8±0.057 3) mm, palatal side (0.306 0±0.050 6)mm) (P<0.05); the GR0 (0.342 5±0.027 9)mm, GR1 (0.162 5±0.056 9)mm, and GR6 (0.239 3±0.020 6)mm of the diode laser group were larger than those of the single cord group, GR0 (0.273 0±0.018 7)mm, GR1 (0.145 9±0.030 8)mm, GR6 (0.162 5±0.015 9)mm (P<0.05). Conclusion The diode laser method can lead to lower pain degree. Both two methods can achieve ideal sulcus width, but permanent gingival recession will be caused. The amount of gingival recession after diode laser gingival retraction is larger. Therefore, it is recommended to use single cord method for patients with thick gums, while for patients sensitive to pain, laser method could also be considered.
Keywords:single cord gingival retraction   diode laser   width of gingival sulcus   gingival recession  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《口腔医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《口腔医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号