手背静脉穿刺两种不同方法的临床比较

目的：通过观察手背静脉穿刺两种不同方法,研究穿刺成功率和对患者疼痛的影响。方法：将200例输液患者随机分为常规法组和改进法组,各100例。常规法组用常规方法穿刺,改进法组用改进法穿刺。结果：改进法一次穿刺成功率明显高于常规法,疼痛发生率明显低于常规法,两组对照比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：用手背静脉穿刺改进法提高了穿刺成功率,达到了无痛或减轻疼痛的效果。

Comparison of two different kinds of intravenous puncture on back of hand

Objective To study how to puncture successfully and make less pain to the patients through observing two different kinds of intravenous puncturing on back of hand.MethodTotal 200 patients for infusion were randomly divided into the regular group and the improving group,100 cases in each group.The regular group were punctured with the general method,while the improving group with an improved one.ResultsThe rate of puncturing successfully in one time with the improved method was obviously higher than that of the regular group,and the improved method caused much less pains,there was much differences between them(P<0.05).ConclusionCarrying on the improved method of intravenous puncturing on back of hand can increase the rate of puncturing successfully and also has an effect on reducing pains.