d-Dimer in patients with suspected acute mesenteric ischemia |
| |
Authors: | Yu-Hui Chiu MD Ming-Kun Huang MD Chorng-Kuang How MD Teh-Fu Hsu MD Jen-Dar Chen MD Chii-Hwa Chern MD David Hung-Tsang Yen MD PhD Chun-I Huang MD |
| |
Affiliation: | aEmergency Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan;bEmergency Department, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei 116, Taiwan;cDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei 112, Taiwan;dInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei 112, Taiwan;eRadiology Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan |
| |
Abstract: | ![]()
ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic value of d-dimer in patients with suspected acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and to evaluate the correlation between d-dimer levels and the severity of bowel necrosis.MethodsA prospective, noninterventional study of 67 patients with clinical suspicion of AMI was performed. Measurement of d-dimer levels was performed using a latex turbidimetric method.ResultsAcute mesenteric ischemia was diagnosed in 23 patients (34.3%) and non-AMI in 44 patients (65.7%). Median d-dimer levels on admission were 6.24 μg fibrinogen equivalent units (FEU)/mL (range, 0.96-53.48 μg FEU/mL) in patients with AMI and 3.45 μg FEU/mL (range, 0.50-44.69 μg FEU/mL) in non-AMI patients (P = .064). d-Dimer had poor discriminative value to differentiate the presence from the absence of AMI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.78). A serum d-dimer cutoff value of 1.0 μg FEU/mL had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 18%, a positive likelihood ratio of 1.17, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.24. Among patients with AMI verified at operation, 8 had resectable bowl necrosis and 9 had unresectable bowel necrosis. There was no difference in serum d-dimer levels between resectable and unresectable bowel necrosis (P = .665).ConclusionsDetection of serum d-dimer could not help to differentiate patient with AMI from those with non-AMI. We did not find a correlation between serum d-dimer levels and the severity of AMI. However, measurement of d-dimer levels can be of value for a small decrease in the likelihood of AMI, when the result is low. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|