首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

“T”型法和三段法在近中水平阻生牙拔除术中的比较
引用本文:孙小玲,方平娟,刘登峰,徐兴侨,肖进. “T”型法和三段法在近中水平阻生牙拔除术中的比较[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2012, 28(10): 1008-1011
作者姓名:孙小玲  方平娟  刘登峰  徐兴侨  肖进
作者单位:1. 温州医学院附属口腔医院口腔放射科 浙江温州 325027
2. 温州医学院附属口腔医院牙体牙髓科
3. 温州医学院附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科
基金项目:温州市科技计划项目(编号:Y20100297)
摘    要:
目的:比较2种方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中手术时间、术后并发症方面的不同,探讨其优缺点.方法:选取60例双侧基本对称下颌阻生第三磨牙患者,两侧用不同方法拔除阻生牙,记录2组手术时间、术中断根情况、术后并发症,采用SPSS17.0软件包对数据进行配对t检验.结果:“T”型组去远中部分时间、术后24 h疼痛和肿胀小于三段组,有统计学差异(P<0.05).结论:在下颌近中阻生牙拔除术中,“T”型法优于三段法.

关 键 词:水平阻生牙  "  T"  型法  三段法  牙拔除术

The Comparative Study of T-shape Method and Three Sections Method Applying in Extraction of Medial Level Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Affiliation:SUN Xiao-lin,FANG Ping-juan,LIU Deng-feng,et al.Department of Dental Radiology,Affiliated Stomatology Hospital,Wenzhou Medical College,Wenzhou 325027
Abstract:
Objective: To compare operating time and postoperative complications between two methods in the extraction of mandible impacted third molars.Methods: Sixty patients with bilateral symmetrical mandible impacted third molars were included in this study.One side of impacted tooth were extracted by using T-shape method,while the others were extracted by using three sections method.Operating time,root pruning situation,postoperative complications were recorded.SPSS17.0 software package was used and paired t-test was performed to analyze the data.Results: There were statistical differences of distal removing time,facial edema and pain of 24h postoperative between two methods(P<0.05).In the T-shape group,the time was shorter,edema and pain were milder.Conclusion: In the extraction of mandible medial impacted third molars,T-shape method is better than three sections method.
Keywords:Level impacted tooth T-shape methods Three sections method Exodontia
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号