首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

应用IRS-PCR对金黄色葡萄球菌分型的研究
引用本文:代文霞,沈叙庄,周红,高薇,张桂荣,俞桑洁,刘艳杰,齐鸿燕,杨永弘.应用IRS-PCR对金黄色葡萄球菌分型的研究[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2005,25(6):514-518.
作者姓名:代文霞  沈叙庄  周红  高薇  张桂荣  俞桑洁  刘艳杰  齐鸿燕  杨永弘
作者单位:100045,北京,首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院微生物室
摘    要:目的探讨低频限制性位点聚合酶链反应(infrequent-restriction-site PCR,IRS-PCR)在金黄色葡萄球菌(简称金葡菌)基因分型中的应用价值。方法建立本实验室IRS-PCR方法。同时用IRS-PCR和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)对金葡菌进行基因分型。根据49株社区感染分离菌的分型结果计算辨别力指数(ID)值估计分辨力。对其中30株社区感染菌重复实验一次估计重复性。比较两种基因分型方法的分型率、分辨力、重复性、结果的一致率及操作特点。结果建立IRS-PCR对金葡菌基因分型的方法。70株金葡菌均可被2种方法分型,分型率100%。IRS-PCR分为38个型,21株院内感染菌分为6个型,49株社区感染菌分为32个型,计算ID值为0.981。PFGE分为40个型,21株院内感染菌分为6个型,49株社区感染菌分为34个型,计算ID值为0.983。两种分型方法的重复性均为100%。对院内感染菌,两种方法分型的一致率为100%;对社区感染菌,两种方法分型的一致率为92%(45/49)。与PFGE相比,IRS-PCR更简单、省时、易于操作、不需特殊昂贵仪器。结论IRS-PCR能对金葡菌简易快速可靠分型,适合检验科对临床标本的快速有效分型,是一种有价值的分子流行病学研究工具。

关 键 词:金黄色葡萄球菌  脉冲场凝胶电泳  聚合酶链反应  基因分型方法  分子流行病学  PFGE  感染菌  金葡菌  PCR方法  感染分离菌  重复性  一致率  应用价值  方法建立  分型结果  重复实验  临床标本  研究工具  分辨力  社区  限制性  实验室
修稿时间:2004年11月22

The application of infrequent-restriction-site PCR as a typing method of Staphylococcus aureus
DAI Wen-xia,SHEN Xu-zhuang,ZHOU Hong,GAO Wei,ZHANG Gui-rong,YU Sang-jie,LIU Yan-jie,QI Hong-yan,YANG Yong-hong.The application of infrequent-restriction-site PCR as a typing method of Staphylococcus aureus[J].Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology,2005,25(6):514-518.
Authors:DAI Wen-xia  SHEN Xu-zhuang  ZHOU Hong  GAO Wei  ZHANG Gui-rong  YU Sang-jie  LIU Yan-jie  QI Hong-yan  YANG Yong-hong
Abstract:Objective To explore the value of infrequent-restriction-site PCR (IRS-PCR) as a typing method of Staphylococcus aureus(Sa). Methods Typing all strains by pulse-field gel electrophoresis(PFGE) and IRS-PCR. Discriminatory index (ID) was measured according to the typing situation of 49 community acquired(CA) strains. Repeating the typing process of 30 strains to examine reproducibility. Typing ability, discriminatory ability, reproducibility, accordance ratio and performance of two genotyping methods were compared. Results IRS-PCR as a genotyping method for Sa was established. 70 strains were all typed by two methods, and typing ability of two methods were both 100%. By IRS-PCR, 70 strains were sorted in to 38 types. 21 hospital acquired(HA) strains were sorted in to 6 types, 49 CA strains were sorted in to 32 types and ID was 0.981. By PFGE, 70 strains were sorted in to 40 types. 21 HA strains were sorted in to 6 types, 49 CA strains were sorted in to 34 types and ID was 0.983. The reproducibility of two typing methods was 100%. For HA strains, the accordance ratio of two typing methods was 100%. For CA strains, the accordance ratio of type was 92%(45/49). Comparing to PFGE , IRS-PCR was simpler, less time- consuming, easy to perform, and does not special need expensive equipments. Conclusion IRS-PCR is an easy, fast and reliable typing method for Sa and suitable for clinical laboratory to type clinical samples quickly and effectively.
Keywords:Staphylococcus aureus  Infrequent-restriction-site PCR(IRS-PCR)  Pulse-field gel electrophoresis(PFGE)  Typing
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号