| MEBT/MEBO与包扎疗法在治疗烧伤中的临床比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王予德. MEBT/MEBO与包扎疗法在治疗烧伤中的临床比较[J]. 中国烧伤创疡杂志, 2002, 14(4): 245-246 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王予德 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 陕西彩虹集团医院,陕西,咸阳,712021 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的：观察MEBT／MEBO与传统包扎疗法治疗烧伤的疗效。方法：在300例烧伤病人中，238例采用MEBT／MEBO技术，68例采用传统包扎疗法，比较两种方法用药后病人的疼痛感觉，活动情况，愈合时间和有无后遗症等情况。结果：MEBT／MEBO技术比传统包扎疗法在烧伤治疗中全面的优势。结论：MEBT／MEBO技术明显优于传统包扎疗法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 烧伤 临床比较 MEBT／MEBO 包扎疗法 治疗 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-0726(2002)04-0245-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-05-02 |
A Comparison Between the Clinical Effects of MEBT/MEBO and Conventional Bandaging Method in Treating Burns |
| |
| Wang Yu-de,Hospital of Caihong Group,Xianyang,Shaanxi Province ,China. A Comparison Between the Clinical Effects of MEBT/MEBO and Conventional Bandaging Method in Treating Burns[J]. The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers, 2002, 14(4): 245-246 |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Yu-de Hospital of Caihong Group Xianyang Shaanxi Province China |
| |
| Affiliation: | Wang Yu-de,Hospital of Caihong Group,Xianyang,Shaanxi Province 712021,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To compare the efficacy between MEBT/MEBO and conventional bandaging method. Method: 238 cases of burn were treated with MEBT/MEBO, and 68 cases treated with conventional bandaging method. A comparison in terms of pain sensation, activity, wound healing time and sequela between the two methods were made. Results: MEBT/MEBO is superior to conventional bandaging method in all the above stated aspects. Conclusion: MEBT/MEBO is superior to conventional bandaging method. |
| |
| Keywords: | MEBT/MEBO Bandaging method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
