首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于3D打印技术的种植手机引导 导板的临床应用
引用本文:周勇,陈婉璐,黄文秀,吴东,肖妍君,林东,郭建斌,蒋剑晖,何炳蔚,陈江. 基于3D打印技术的种植手机引导 导板的临床应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(7): 766. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.07.019
作者姓名:周勇  陈婉璐  黄文秀  吴东  肖妍君  林东  郭建斌  蒋剑晖  何炳蔚  陈江
作者单位:1. 福建医科大学附属口腔医院种植科 福建 福州 350002;2. 福州大学 福建 福州 350002
基金项目:国家卫计委共建科研基金——第四轮福建省卫生教育联合攻关项目(编号:WKJ2016-2-01)
摘    要:目的:利用CBCT、3D打印技术等设计制作新型口腔种植导板和种植手机引导装置,应用于临床并对其进行精度评价。方法:利用Mimics、Simplant等软件设计制造种植外科导板,分为套筒引导(A组)和种植手机引导(B组)行种植手术。分析虚拟与实际植体的偏差,比较2组的精确度是否有统计学差异。结果:15例患者的92枚植体,A组44枚和B组48枚,测量虚拟与实际植体在颈部、顶部、深度、角度偏离值:(0.82±0.47) mm,(0.97±0.52) mm,(0.81±0.42) mm,(7.89±4.24)°。两独立样本t检验,双侧α=0.05,得到A组和B组差异无统计学意义,不认为两者的偏离值的总体均数不相等。结论:套筒引导和种植手机引导精确度基本无差别,两者的联合应用具有较高的精确性等优点。

关 键 词:种植  计算机辅助设计/制作  种植手机引导  3D打印  精度评价  
收稿时间:2017-01-22

Clinical Application of Handpiece Surgical Guide Based on 3D Printing Technology.
ZHOU Yong,CHEN Wan-lu,HUANG Wen-xiu,WU Dong,XIAO Yan-jun,LIN Dong,GUO Jian-bin,JIANG Jian-hui,HE Bing-wei,CHEN Jiang.. Clinical Application of Handpiece Surgical Guide Based on 3D Printing Technology.[J]. Journal of Oral Science Research, 2017, 33(7): 766. DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.07.019
Authors:ZHOU Yong  CHEN Wan-lu  HUANG Wen-xiu  WU Dong  XIAO Yan-jun  LIN Dong  GUO Jian-bin  JIANG Jian-hui  HE Bing-wei  CHEN Jiang.
Affiliation:1. Department of Oral Implantology, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China; 2. Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
Abstract:Objective: To design a handpiece surgical guide and to evaluate its clinical effect and accuracy using CBCT technology and 3D printing. Methods: We designed and manufactured handpiece surgical guide with Mimics, Simplant and other softwares. The patients were carried surgery and divided into sleeve guide group (group A) and handpiece guide group (group B). we analyzed the deviation (entry, apical, vertical, and axis)between virtual and actual implants on preoperative and postoperative CBCT data. Results: Ninety-two implants were inserted into 15 patients, including 44 implants for group A and 48 implants for group B. The deviations of entry, apical, vertical, and axis were (0.82 ± 0.47) mm, (0.97 ± 0.47) mm, (0.81 ± 0.43) mm, and (7.89 ± 4.26)°, respectively. According to the analysis of variance, the statistical test found no significant difference in apical, vertical and axis between the two groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in accuracy between sleeve guide and handpiece guide. A combination of sleeve guide and handpiece guide is advocated.
Keywords:Dental implant   Computer aided design and manufacture   Handpiece surgical guide   3D printingAccuracy evaluation  
点击此处可从《口腔医学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《口腔医学研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号