Identifying recent HIV infections using the avidity index and an automated enzyme immunoassay |
| |
Authors: | Suligoi Barbara Massi Mario Galli Claudio Sciandra Mauro Di Sora Fiorella Pezzotti Patrizio Recchia Olga Montella Francesco Sinicco Alessandro Rezza Giovanni |
| |
Affiliation: | Reparto AIDS e MSTl, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy. suligoi@iss.it |
| |
Abstract: | We evaluated a procedure for identifying recent HIV infections, using sequential serum samples from 47 HIV-positive persons for whom the seroconversion date could be accurately estimated. Each serum sample was divided into two aliquots: one diluted with phosphate-buffered saline and the other diluted with 1 M guanidine. We assayed the aliquots with the automated AxSYM HIV1/2gO test (Abbott Diagnostics Division), without modifying the manufacturer's protocol. We then calculated the avidity index (AI): the ratio of the sample/cutoff value for the guanidine aliquot to that of the phosphate-buffered saline aliquot. We analyzed 216 serum samples: 34 samples were collected within 6 months of seroconversion (recent seroconversions), and 182 were collected after 6 months. The mean AIs, by time from seroconversion, were 0.68 +/- 0.16 (within 6 months) and 0.98 +/- 0.10 (after 6 months) (P < 0.0001). AI of <0.90 correctly identified 88.2% of recent infections but misclassified as recent infections 13.2% of serum samples collected afterward. The probability of an infection being classified as recent and having AI of > or = 0.90 would be 0.7% in a population with 5% recent infections. AI can identify with a certain degree of accuracy recent HIV infections, and being a quantitative index, it provides different levels of sensitivity and specificity, depending on the selected cutoff value. The standard assay procedure is not modified. This test is simple and inexpensive and could be used for surveillance, decision-making in treatment, and prevention. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|