D型人格量表(DS14)在中国两所大学生样本中的试用

目的:探讨D型人格量表在我国大学生中的信效度,考察D型人格在我国人群中的分布及其文化含义。方法:将Denollet的D型人格量表(DS14)修订成中文版问卷,以艾森克人格问卷简式量表为效标,施测于我国两所大学的学生。结果:DS14中文版两个分量表的内部一致性系数消极情感为0．92,社交压抑为0．79。结构效度符合两因素的理论构想(消极情感的题目负荷为0．71-0．87,社交压抑的题目负荷为0．53-0．75),验证性因素分析结果为X2／df=3．19,GFI=0．90,NNFI=0．91,CFI=0．91,RM- SEA=0．06。消极情感与神经质的相关系数为0．69,社交压抑与外向性的相关为-0．69,消极情感与精神质的相关为0．19(均P<0．05),社交压抑与精神质的相关无显著。我国被试在消极情感和社交压抑方面没有性别差异,在D型人格的比例上也是如此。但我国大学生中D型人格类型的比率为31．6％,远高于荷兰普通人群(21％)。结论:DS14中文版是测量个体消极情感和社交压抑倾向的有效工具,可用于鉴别具有D 型人格的高危人群。

Application of Type D Personality Scale ( DS14 ) in Chinese College Students

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Type D Personality Scale in Chinese college students and the prevalence of type D personality in Chinese culture. Methods: This study adapted Type D Personality Scale (DS14) into Chinese version and administered it in 280 college students and got 266 qualified responses. Results: Our results indicated that DS14 was internal consistent, and well validated against EPQ (NA had positive correlation with Neuroticism of EPQ, r = 0. 69; SI had negative correlation with Extroversion, r = -0. 69) . Corresponding to theoretical frame of type D personality, factor analysis of DS14 extracted two factors ( the loads of NA were 0. 71- 0. 87, that of SI were 0. 53- 0. 75), supported by two-dimension structure of confirmatory factor analysis (X2/df = 3.19, GFI = 0.90, NNFI = 0.91, CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.06) . Chinese college students sample showed no gender difference on negative affectivity and social inhibition, as well as the proportion of type D personality. But type D personality was more prevalent in Chinese participants (31.6% ) than Netherland's healthy population (21% ) . Conclusion: Chinese version of DS14 was an effective measurement for negative affectivity and social inhibition that could identify high-risk population with type D personality.