《医院急诊科规范化流程》分诊标准在临床急诊工作中的应用实践

目的：通过与5级国际预检系统（5LNTS）进行比较，探讨《医院急诊科规范化流程》急诊分诊标准（4级分级标准）的临床应用。方法对2015年1月1日至1月31日于巫山县人民医院急诊科就诊的984例患者进行4级分级标准分诊评估，5LNTS作为对照评估标准，比较两种标准的错误率、评估时间及使用难易程度。结果4级分级标准分诊错误率为4．7％，5LNTS分诊错误率为3．6％，差异无统计学意义（χ2＝1．220，P＝0．269）。两种标准的分诊用时比较，差异有统计学意义（t＝－2．291，P＝0．04）；而使用难易程度比较，差异无统计学意义（χ2＝1．143，P＝0．285）。结论《医院急诊科规范化流程》推荐的4级分级标准与国际上得到广泛认可的5LNTS在分诊错误率、使用难易程度上无明显差异，具有临床推广价值。

Application practice of triage criteria of Hospital Emergency Department Standardization Process in clinical emergency work

Objective To investigate the clinical application of the emergency triage criteria in the Hospital Emergency De‐partment Standardization Process by comparing it with the 5 level national triage system (5L NTS) .Methods Totally 984 patients visiting the emergency department of the Wushan County People′s Hospital from January 1 to January 31 ,2015 were chosen to con‐duct the evaluation of 4‐grade classification standard triage with 5L NTS as the control evaluation criteria .The error rate ,evaluation time and degree of difficulty or ease were compared between the two criteria .Results The error rate of 4‐grade triage standard was 4 .7% ,which of 5L NTS was 3 .6% ,the difference was not statistically significant (χ2 =1 .220 ,P=0 .269) .The triage time had sta‐tistical difference between the two criteria (t= -2 .291 ,P=0 .04) ,while the degree of difficulty or ease in using criteria had no sta‐tistical difference(χ2 =1 .143 ,P=0 .285) .Conclusion The 4‐grade triage criteria recommended by the Hospital Emergency Depart‐ment Standardization Process has no obvious differences in the aspects of triage error rate ,degree of difficulty or ease in use com‐pared with the widely recognized 5L NTS in the world ,and has the clinical promotion value .