健康城市的现代理念

  目的  全面比较健康城市与国家卫生城市的差异，更好地推进健康城市建设。  方法  采用系统综述方法，检索PubMed、中国知网等8个电子数据库和国内外相关机构网站中比较健康城市与国家卫生城市的文献。共检索542篇，通过文献筛选，最后纳入4篇文献进行分析。  结果  健康城市与国家卫生城市在最终目的和部分评价指标上是相同的；在背景、评价方法和指标体系等6个方面存在差异。卫生城市主要涉及公共卫生领域，用统一的指标体系进行评价，有考核和命名程序；健康城市几乎涉及所有健康相关的领域，注重自我评价，无考核与命名程序。  结论  为更好地促进健康城市建设活动，除应获得政府支持和加强全社会的参与，对于从业人员的相关健康教育也非常重要。

The healthy city: its function and its future

  Objective  To compare differences between the healthy city and national sanitary city for promoting the construction of healthy city.  Methods  Through PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and other electronic databases and web sites, we systemically searched literatures on healthy city and national sanitary city published in Chinese and English. We included 4 of the 542 retrieved literatures in the analysis.  Results  The objective and some of the assessment indicators are the same for both the healthy city and the national sanitary city. But the initiative background, assessment procedure and indicator system are not the same for the healthy city and national sanitary city. The initiative of national sanitary city mainly involves public health field and is assessed with a unified index system and definite evaluating and naming procedures. However, the initiative of healthy city involves almost all health-related fields and the construction of healthy city is self-assessed without definite appraising and naming procedures.  Conclusion  Apart from government support and enhanced participation of the whole society, health education among the professionals is also important for the promotion of Healthy City Program in China.