首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

生理学试卷传统和情景式选择题的比较
引用本文:李烁,郭玲,庞炜,李肖霞,陈曼,宋德懋,祝世功. 生理学试卷传统和情景式选择题的比较[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2017, 37(1). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2017.01.053
作者姓名:李烁  郭玲  庞炜  李肖霞  陈曼  宋德懋  祝世功
作者单位:北京大学医学部生理学与病理生理学系,北京,100191
基金项目:北京大学医学部教育教学研究重点立项课题
摘    要:目的评估情景式考题对生理学试卷质量和考察学生能力的作用。方法以难度系数和区分度为指标,比较试卷情景式和传统选择题的考核效果。结果情景式考题难度系数比传统考题有所增加,且情景式考题的区分度更合理。理解型情景式考题区分度高于传统的记忆型和理解型考题,应用型情景式考题区分度与相应的传统考题相比没有差别。结论情景式考试题不仅能提高试卷质量,更能考察和评估学生的学习能力。

关 键 词:生理学  试卷分析  区分度  难度系数  情景式选择题

Comparison of the traditional and situational choice questions in the physiological examination
LI Shuo,GUO Ling,PANG Wei,LI Xiao-xia,CHEN Man,SONG De-mao,ZHU Shi-gong. Comparison of the traditional and situational choice questions in the physiological examination[J]. Basic Medical Sciences and Clinics, 2017, 37(1). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2017.01.053
Authors:LI Shuo  GUO Ling  PANG Wei  LI Xiao-xia  CHEN Man  SONG De-mao  ZHU Shi-gong
Abstract:Objective Evaluating the effect of situational questions for qualifying the students'abilities in physiolo-gy examination .Methods Comparing the difficulty coefficients and discrimination indexes between situational and traditional choice questions .Results Compared with the traditional choice questions , the difficulty coefficient of situational questions increased , while the discrimination indexes were more reasonable .The discrimination indexes of situational understanding questions were higher than those of the traditional memory and understanding questions . There were no difference between discrimination indexes of the situational application questions and those of tradi -tional application questions .Conclusions Situational questions not only improved the quality of examinations , but also facilitate evaluating students'learning ability .
Keywords:physiology  test paper analysis  discrimination index  difficulty coefficient  situational choice questions
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号