Genetic counseling dilemmas: Down syndrome,paternal age,and recurrence risk after remarriage

The recent demonstration that about 20–30% of cases of Down syndrome are of paternal origin has again raised interest in the question of the possible contribution of paternal age independent of maternal age to a couple's risk of a Down syndrome live birth. In this paper the nature of the available evidence is critically reviewed, interpretations reconciling differences between studies that reached opposite conclusions are presented, and an approach to genetic counseling in the face of such apparent differences in the literature is discussed. It is not likely that data from ad hoc studies of parental origin of the extra chromosome will be sufficient to judge the existence or magnitude of paternal age-specific risk, and reliance must be made on statistical studies that searched for paternal age effects while controlling for maternal age. The literature is consistent with an apparent doubling of risk for paternal age 55 and over, but no effect at younger paternal ages. With regard to remarriage, it is suggested that if members of a couple with a 47, +21 child remarry it be assumed that the excess risk “travels” to that new couple which includes the parent in whom non-disjunction occurred in the previous marriage. If parental origin is not known, it is suggested that the risk be calculated on the assumption of a 20–30% likelihood that it was of paternal origin and a 70–80% likelihood that it was of maternal origin, and that the excess empiric risks be apportioned accordingly in the new marriages.