首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Brazilian Intragastric Balloon Consensus Statement (BIBC): practical guidelines based on experience of over 40,000 cases
Authors:Manoel Galvao Neto  Lyz Bezerra Silva  Eduardo Grecco  Luiz Gustavo de Quadros  André Teixeira  Thiago Souza  Jimi Scarparo  Artur A. Parada  Ricardo Dib  Rena Moon  Josemberg Campos
Affiliation:1. 9 de Julho Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil;2. Florida International University, Miami, Florida;3. Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil;4. ABC Medical School, Mário Covas State Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil;5. Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida;6. Scarparo Scopia Clinic, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract:

Background

Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are a minimally invasive option for obesity treatment, acting as a space-occupying device and leading to weight loss through increased satiety. This device has been growing in popularity owing to its safety profile and good weight loss results. However, there are no published guidelines that standardize the technical aspects of the procedure.

Objectives

To create a practical guideline for intragastric balloon usage.

Setting

Private and Academic Settings, Brazil.

Methods

A consensus meeting was held in São Paulo, Brazil, in June 2016, bringing together 39 Brazilian endoscopists with extensive experience in IGBs from all regions of the country. Topics on patient selection, indications, contraindications, multidisciplinary follow-up, technique, and adverse events were discussed in the form of questions. After electronic voting, a consensus was defined when there was ≥70% agreement. Experts were also requested to provide data on their experience with IGBs.

Results

The selected experts discussed and reached a consensus on 76 questions, mainly concerning specific indications and contraindications for the procedure; technical details, such as patient preparation, minimum balloon-filling volume, techniques for implant and explant; patient follow-up and recommended medication for the adaptation period; and adverse event management. The overall Brazilian expert data encompassed 41,863 IGBs, with a mean percentage total weight loss of 18.4% ± 2.9%. The adverse event rate after the adaptation period was 2.5%, the most common being hyperinflation (.9%) and spontaneous deflation (.8%) of the device. The early removal rate due to intolerance was 2.2%.

Conclusions

The present consensus represents practical recommendations for performing IGB procedures and reflects Brazil’s significant experience with this device. The experience of over 40,000 cases shows that the device leads to satisfactory weight loss with a low rate of adverse events.
Keywords:Consensus statement  Intragastric balloon  Obesity  Endoscopy  Bariatric endoscopy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号