Urine and Plasma Pharmacokinetics of Lofexidine after Oral Delivery in Opiate-Dependent Patients |
| |
Authors: | Abeer M. Al Ghananeem Barbara H. Herman Maggie Abbassi Elmer Yu Karen Miotto Charles P. O'Brien |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA;2. Division of Pharmacotherapy and Medical Consequences of Drug Abuse (DPMCDA), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA;3. University of Pennsylvania &4. Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia VAMC 116, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;5. University of California at Los Angeles &6. Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate lofexidine urine and plasma pharmacokinetics using three different dosing regimens in opioid dependent subjects. To date, there have been no published studies on lofexidine appearance and excretion in urine of opioid dependent subjects. Methods: Subjects were stabilized with 100 mg morphine sulphate on days 3–8 of the study. The dosing regimens of lofexidine hydrochloride were .8 mg twice a day (BID), 1.2 mg BID, or .8 mg three times a day (TID) on days 9 through 16 of the study. Plasma and urine samples were collected at appropriate time points. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax), time when maximum concentration was reached (Tmax) and fraction excreted unchanged in urine (Fe) were calculated. Results: The average half-life obtained from all profiles was 12.1 ± 6.3 hr. Steady-state (SS) was reached by study day 15. The plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for 1.2 mg BID and .8 mg TID dosing regimens did not seem to be different at steady state (day 15). Tmax was not statistically significantly different across dosing regimens. Fe values ranged between .01% and 34% with high variability within the same dosing regimen. For the total dose of 2.4 mg/day the two dosing regimens that were evaluated, namely 1.2 mg BID and .8 mg TID, did not show a significant statistical difference in plasma and urine pharmacokinetic parameters. Conclusion: Although preliminary due to the limited number of subjects, these findings are the first to document lofexidine urine pharmacokinetics in opiate addicts using a highly sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric analysis. |
| |
Keywords: | Clinical trial lofexidine oral delivery pharmacokinetics urine |
|
|