首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Bridge to durable left ventricular assist device for refractory cardiogenic shock
Authors:Daisuke Yoshioka  Hiroo Takayama  Arthur R. Garan  Veli K. Topkara  Jiho Han  Boyganzi Li  Paul Kurlansky  Melana Yuzefpolskaya  Paolo C. Colombo  Yoshifumi Naka  Koji Takeda
Affiliation:1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY;2. Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Abstract:

Objective

The role of short-term mechanical circulatory support has increased in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, limited data exist on the outcomes of a bridge to a durable left ventricular assist device strategy using short-term mechanical circulatory support.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 382 patients who underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device insertion between 2004 and 2014. Of these, 45 (12%) were bridged with short-term mechanical circulatory support devices for refractory cardiogenic shock. We analyzed early and midterm outcomes in this bridged cohort. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to evaluate the predictor of overall death in the entire cohort.

Results

The mean age of the bridged cohort was 53 ± 10 years, and 87% were male. The types of initial support included percutaneous devices in 24 patients (53%) and external continuous-flow ventricular assist device in 21 patients (47%). The median duration of short-term mechanical circulatory support was 14.0 (interquartile range, 7.5-29.5) days. The short-term mechanical circulatory support significantly improved end-organ function and hemodynamics. After conversion to durable left ventricular assist device insertion, in-hospital mortality was 18%. The incidence of right ventricular assist device use was high at 27%. The overall survival was 70% and 62% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Cox multivariate hazard analysis in the entire cohort demonstrated that the use of a postoperative right ventricular assist device was a significant predictor of overall death (hazard ratio, 4.04; P < .001; 95% confidence interval, 1.97-7.94), but the use of a short-term mechanical circulatory support was not (P = .937).

Conclusions

Short-term mechanical circulatory support can optimize patients in refractory cardiogenic shock and serve as a bridge to implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device. However, the early mortality rate after durable left ventricular assist device implantation is high because of unrecognized right ventricular failure.
Keywords:bridge to bridge  cardiogenic shock  left ventricular assist device  short-term mechanical circulatory support  BTB  bridge-to-bridge  ECMO  extracorporeal membrane oxygenation  HMRS  HeartMate II Risk Score  INR  international normalized ratio  INTERMACS  Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support  LV  left ventricular  LVAD  left ventricular assist device  MELD  Model for End-Stage Liver Disease  RVAD  right ventricular assist device  ST-MCS  short-term mechanical circulatory support
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号