首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

霉酚酸酯治疗特发性膜性肾病的荟萃分析
引用本文:王小琴,王长江,袁军,尹平. 霉酚酸酯治疗特发性膜性肾病的荟萃分析[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2010, 26(2): 91-94. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-7097.2010.02.005
作者姓名:王小琴  王长江  袁军  尹平
作者单位:DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-7097.2010.02.005 作者单位:430061 武汉,湖北中医学院附属医院肾内科 (王小琴、王长江、袁军);华中科技大学同济医学院流行病与卫生统计学系(尹平)
摘    要:目的 评价霉酚酸酯治疗特发性膜性肾病的临床疗效和不良反应。 方法 检索了PubMed-Medline、EMBASE和Cochrane Library电子数据库的霉酚酸酯治疗特发性膜性肾病的随机对照试验或临床对照试验。疗效使用优势比(OR)进行计算评估;不良反应用相对危险度(RR)进行计算评估。 结果 3个随机对照试验和1个临床对照试验,共计141例被纳入本次研究。3个随机对照试验分别比较了霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺、非免疫抑制剂的保守治疗和苯丁酸氮芥的疗效。1个临床对照试验比较了霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺的疗效。与对照组相比,霉酚酸酯治疗特发性膜性肾病的临床完全缓解、部分缓解和总缓解率的OR(95%CI)分别为0.74(0.32~1.75)、0.56(0.28~1.11)和0.46(0.23~0.92)。表明霉酚酸酯治疗特发性膜性肾病的临床完全缓解、部分缓解率与对照组相当(P > 0.05),而总缓解率明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。霉酚酸酯与其他免疫抑制剂在感染、胃肠道症状和贫血等不良反应差异无统计学意义,但霉酚酸酯可以降低白细胞减少症的发生率,其RR(95%CI)为 0.06(0.01~0.41)。 结论 不推荐霉酚酸酯作为特发性膜性肾病的首选用药。

关 键 词:肾小球肾炎膜性MEDLARS(医学文献法分析和检索系统)循证医学霉酚酸酯

Mycophenolate mofetil treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy:a meta-analysis
WANG Xiao-qin,WANG Chang-jiang,YUAN Jun,YIN Ping. Mycophenolate mofetil treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy:a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Nephrology, 2010, 26(2): 91-94. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-7097.2010.02.005
Authors:WANG Xiao-qin  WANG Chang-jiang  YUAN Jun  YIN Ping
Affiliation:*Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061,China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy(IMN).Methods Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and clinical controlled trials(CCTs)were used for the recta-analysis.Electronic and manual retrieval from Pubmed-Medline,EMBASE and Cochrane Library Database were performed to identify RCTs or CCTs in which MMF was compared with other regimes in treating IMN.Efficacy and side effects data were extracted and summarized with fixed effect model odds ratio(OR)or risk ratio(OR).Results Three RCTs and one CCT with 141 patients were enrolled in the study.In 3 RCTs,MMF was compared with cyclophosphamide(CTX),conservative treatment(non-immunosuppressive)and chlorambucil respectively.In the CCT,MMF was compared with cyclophosphamide.Compared with control groups,MMF did not significantly increase the complete remission(OR=0.74,95%CI=0.32-1.75)and partial remission(OR=0.56,95%CI=0.28-1.11).The overall response rate of MMF therapy was significantly lower than that of control groups (OR=0.46,95%CI=0.23-0.92).There was no significant difference in infection,gastrointestinal symptoms or anemia among the patients receiving MMF and the patients receiving other immunosuppressive agents,but MMF reduced the incidence of leucopenia obviously(OR=0.06,95% CI=0.01-0.41).Conclusion Mycophenolate mofetil should not be recommended as the firstline therapy for IMN.
Keywords:Glomerulonephritis,membranous  MEDLARS  Evidence-based medicine  Mycophenolate mofetil
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华肾脏病杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华肾脏病杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号