首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE Ⅱ scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome
引用本文:Leung TK,Lee CM,Lin SY,Chen HC,Wang HJ,Shen LK,Chen YY. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE Ⅱ scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome[J]. World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2005, 11(38): 6049-6052. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049
作者姓名:Leung TK  Lee CM  Lin SY  Chen HC  Wang HJ  Shen LK  Chen YY
摘    要:

关 键 词:X线检查  慢性健康评估Ⅱ  急性胰腺炎  临床表现  检查方法
收稿时间:2005-01-31

Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome
Leung Ting-Kai,Lee Chi-Ming,Lin Shyr-Yi,Chen Hsin-Chi,Wang Hung-Jung,Shen Li-Kuo,Chen Ya-Yen. Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome[J]. World journal of gastroenterology : WJG, 2005, 11(38): 6049-6052. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049
Authors:Leung Ting-Kai  Lee Chi-Ming  Lin Shyr-Yi  Chen Hsin-Chi  Wang Hung-Jung  Shen Li-Kuo  Chen Ya-Yen
Affiliation:Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, 252, Wu Hsing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan, China.
Abstract:AIM: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index (CTSI). The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score in course and outcome prediction of AP. METHODS: We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrast-enhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE II score. In addition, complications, duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters. RESULTS: We classified 85 patients (79%) as having mild AP (CTSI <5) and 22 patients (21%) as having severe AP (CTSI > or =5). In mild group, the mean APACHE II score and Ranson score was 8.6+/-1.9 and 2.4+/-1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2+/-2.1 and 3.1+/-0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 (20%) patients and their CTSI was 5.9+/-1.4. A CTSI > or =5 significantly correlated with death, complication present, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with a CTSI > or =5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI <5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI <5, respectively. CONCLUSION: CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI > or =5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE II score also are choices to be the predictors for complications, mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.
Keywords:Acute pancreatitis   Ranson score   APACHE II score   Balthazar computed tomography severity index
本文献已被 维普 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号