Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial |
| |
Authors: | Dragsted Ulrik Bak,Gerstoft Jan,Pedersen Court,Peters Barry,Duran Adriana,Obel Niels,Castagna Antonella,Cahn Pedro,Clumeck Nathan,Bruun Johan N,Benetucci Jorge,Hill Andrew,Cassetti Isabel,Vernazza Pietro,Youle Mike,Fox Zoe,Lundgren Jens D MaxCmin Trial Group |
| |
Affiliation: | Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. ubd@cphiv.dk |
| |
Abstract: | This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P=.76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|