文献计量学视角的中医药文献信息化研究现状探讨

目的：揭示中医药文献信息化的研究现状，探讨此领域研究热点、存在问题及发展趋势，为今后的研究提供数据基础和科学依据。方法：以中国知网（CNKI）期刊数据库作为检索来源，检索2005-2014年间相关学术论文，通过文献计量学等方法，从论文量年度变化、基金资助、载文期刊、研究机构、研究人员和研究内容6个方面进行分析。结果：此领域研究越来越受到学者关注，获基金支持力度大、层次高，主要的刊载期刊有中华中医药杂志、世界科学技术-中医药现代化、中国中医药信息杂志等，主要研究机构有北京中医药大学、中国中医科学院、山东中医药大学、南京中医药大学、广州中医药大学等。近十年研究者主要围绕数据挖掘、中医证候、用药规律、文献研究等问题进行研究。结论：学术论文量总体呈增长趋势，科研力量地区分布不均衡。古籍文献研究基础薄弱、方法和技术尚不成熟；文献信息资源的评价和服务研究还处于起步阶段，是值得深入研究的新领域；学科交叉领域的方法学探索及评价研究对中医药文献信息化的发展完善是极有意义的。

The Status and Exploration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Literature Informationization in Bibliometric View

In this paper, the current status of research on TCM literature informationization was revealed, and the related research hot issues, current problems and developing trends were also analyzed. The authors would provide data basis and scientific proof for future study. CNKI library was used as a source to retrieve literatures (from 2005 to 2014) for research of TCM literature informationization. The following six aspects, including the annual change of documentation quantity, supporting funds, published journals, research institutions, leading researchers, and research contents were analyzed through bibliometric methods. This field was concerned by more and more researchers, and was largely supported by funds. The papers were mainly published in the Chinese Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica - World Science & Technology, Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, etc. The research institutions mainly included Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, and other institutions. In recent ten years, the researchers were focused on data mining, TCM syndrome, drug laws and literature study, etc. The total documentation quantity increased, but the scientific power was not distributed evenly. The foundation for ancient literature research was weak, and related method and technology were not mature. Evaluation and service of the literatures information source was still in the initial stage. The analysis and evaluation of methodology in multidisciplinary fields is very meaningful for the improvement of TCM literature informationization.