Drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction: updated meta-analysis of randomized trials |
| |
Authors: | Alban Dibra Klaus Tiroch Stefanie Schulz Henning Kelbæk Christian Spaulding Gerrit J. Laarman Marco Valgimigli Emilio Di Lorenzo Christoph Kaiser Ilkka Tierala Julinda Mehilli Gianluca Campo Leif Thuesen Maarten A. Vink Martin J. Schalij Roberto Violini Albert Schömig Adnan Kastrati |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universit?t, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany 2. Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 3. Assistance Publique-H?pitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Cochin Hospital, Paris 5 Medical School Rene Descartes University and INSERM U780-Avenir, Paris, France 4. King’s College Hospital, London, UK 5. University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy 6. A.O.R.N. “S. G. Moscati”, Avellino, Italy 7. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 8. Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 9. Skejby Sygehus, Skejby, Denmark 10. Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 11. Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands 12. San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
|
| |
Abstract: | ![]()
Background Use of drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains an “off label” indication due to concerns regarding their performance in this patient subset. Methods We searched Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Internet-based sources of information on clinical trials in cardiology for randomized trials comparing drug-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in patients with AMI. Hazard ratios for the composite of death or recurrent myocardial infarction, (primary safety endpoint), reintervention (primary efficacy endpoint), death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were calculated performing a meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials with 7,781 patients. Results There was no difference in the hazard of death or recurrent myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.91; [95% CI 0.75–1.09]) between patients treated with drug-eluting stents versus patients treated with bare-metal stents. Treatment with drug-eluting stents resulted in a significant reduction in the hazard of reintervention (0.41 [95% CI 0.32–0.52]). The hazards of death (0.90 [95% CI 0.71–1.15]), myocardial infarction (0.81 [95% CI 0.63–1.04]), and stent thrombosis (0.84 [95% CI 0.61–1.17]) were not significantly different between patients treated with drug-eluting stents versus patients treated with bare-metal stents. Conclusions Use of drug-eluting stents in patients with AMI is safe and markedly reduces the need for reintervention as compared to bare-metal stents. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|