老年活体供肾移植术后供者安全性及受者移植效果的分析

目的 分析老年活体供肾移植术后供者的安全性及受者的移植效果.方法 回顾性分析251例亲属活体供肾移植的临床资料.根据供者年龄,将251例活体供肾移植分为老年供肾组(≥55岁)和中青年供肾组(<55岁),对手术前后两组供、受者的血清肌酐(Cr)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)、内生肌酐清除率(Ccr)、并发症、平均住院时间以及受者的人/肾存活率、急性排斥反应发生率进行比较和分析.结果 老年供肾组和中青年供肾组供者手术前后血Cr水平的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而Ccr的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).老年供肾组与中青年供肾组供者比较,术前总GFR、留存肾GFR及术后10 d留存肾GFR比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);老年供肾组供者术后10 d与术前的留存肾GFR比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);中青年供肾组供者术后10 d的留存肾GFR较术前明显上升,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).老年供肾组与中青年供肾组受者比较,手术前后各相应时间点的血Cr水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).老年供肾组和中青年供肾组供者平均住院时间分别为(16.67±7.78)d和(16.11±5.89)d(P>0.05),受者平均住院时间分别为(29.61±24.28)d和(28.76±19.27)d(P>0.05).两组受者6个月内急性排斥反应发生率分别为6.50%和5.75%(P>0.05).老年供肾组受者术后死亡1例,中青年供肾组死亡3例,并有1例因急性排斥反应切除移植肾.结论 老年活体供肾移植术前应对供者进行严格的选择,在进行全面系统评估的前提下,可以保证供者术后的安全以及受者的移植效果.

The safety for donors and effectiveness for recipients of living-related donor kidney transplantation from elder donors

Objective To investigate the safety for donors and the effectiveness for recipients of living-related donor (LRD) kidney transplantation from elder donors. Methods 251 cases of LRD kidney transplantation were reviewed. According to the age of LRDs, the patients were divided into 2 groups:≥55 years group (group A) and <55 years (group B). The parameters studied included serum creatinine (Cr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), creatinine clearance (Ccr), perioperative complications, average hospital stay, and acute rejection rate of LRDs and recipients were compared. Results (1)There was no significant difference in serum Cr between groups A and B at different time points (P>0.05). (2)There was no significant difference in Ccr between two groups pre-donation (P = 0.45). But at the 10th day after the donor nephrectomy, Ccr level in group A was significant lower than in group B (P<0.01). (3)Total GFR pre-donation, remaining renal GFR, and remaining renal GFR on the day 10 after donation had no significant difference in both groups A and B (P>0.05). Remaining renal GFR on the day 10 before and after donation had no significant difference in group A (P>0.05), but on the day 10 after donation that was significantly increased in group B as compared with that pre-donation (P<0.01). (4) The serum Cr of recipients at different time points after transplantation had no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). (5) The mean hospital stay after donation of LRDs and recipients had no significant difference between two groups. (6) The incidence of recipients" acute rejection was 6.50 % (5/77) in group A, and 5.75%(10/174) in group B within 6 months after operation (P = 0.95). Conclusion Transplantations performed from the elderly donors will yield similar results from younger donors if the eider donors are evaluated or assessed as the standards.