Modeling Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Data with a Constrained Local AIF |
| |
Authors: | Chong Duan Jesper F. Kallehauge Carlos J. Pérez-Torres G. Larry Bretthorst Scott C. Beeman Kari Tanderup Joseph J. H. Ackerman |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Chemistry,Washington University,Saint Louis,USA;2.Department of Medical Physics,Aarhus University,Aarhus,Denmark;3.Department of Oncology,Aarhus University,Aarhus,Denmark;4.Department of Radiology,Washington University,Saint Louis,USA;5.School of Health Sciences,Purdue University,West Lafayette,USA;6.Department of Radiation Oncology,Washington University,Saint Louis,USA;7.Institute of Clinical Medicine,Aarhus University,Aarhus,Denmark;8.Department of Medicine,Washington University,Saint Louis,USA;9.Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center,Washington University,Saint Louis,USA |
| |
Abstract: |
PurposeThis study aims to develop a constrained local arterial input function (cL-AIF) to improve quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data by accounting for the contrast-agent bolus amplitude error in the voxel-specific AIF.ProceduresBayesian probability theory-based parameter estimation and model selection were used to compare tracer kinetic modeling employing either the measured remote-AIF (R-AIF, i.e., the traditional approach) or an inferred cL-AIF against both in silico DCE-MRI data and clinical, cervical cancer DCE-MRI data.ResultsWhen the data model included the cL-AIF, tracer kinetic parameters were correctly estimated from in silico data under contrast-to-noise conditions typical of clinical DCE-MRI experiments. Considering the clinical cervical cancer data, Bayesian model selection was performed for all tumor voxels of the 16 patients (35,602 voxels in total). Among those voxels, a tracer kinetic model that employed the voxel-specific cL-AIF was preferred (i.e., had a higher posterior probability) in 80 % of the voxels compared to the direct use of a single R-AIF. Maps of spatial variation in voxel-specific AIF bolus amplitude and arrival time for heterogeneous tissues, such as cervical cancer, are accessible with the cL-AIF approach.ConclusionsThe cL-AIF method, which estimates unique local-AIF amplitude and arrival time for each voxel within the tissue of interest, provides better modeling of DCE-MRI data than the use of a single, measured R-AIF. The Bayesian-based data analysis described herein affords estimates of uncertainties for each model parameter, via posterior probability density functions, and voxel-wise comparison across methods/models, via model selection in data modeling. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|