首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations
Authors:G. M. Blake  D. J. Chinn  S. A. Steel  R. Patel  E. Panayiotou  J. Thorpe  J. N. Fordham
Affiliation:(1) Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy"rsquo"s Hospital, St Thomas Street, London , SE1 9RT, UK;(2) Guy"rsquo"s, King"rsquo"s and St Thomas"rsquo" School of Medicine, London, UK;(3) University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK;(4) Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Hull Royal Infirmary, UK;(5) James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
Abstract:
The UK National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) has recently issued new guidelines on the use of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) devices in managing osteoporosis. The NOS guidelines recommend a triage approach in which patientsrsquo bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are interpreted using upper and lower thresholds specific to each type of pDXA device. The thresholds are defined so that patients with osteoporosis at the hip or spine are identified with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Patients with a pDXA result below the lower threshold are likely to have osteoporosis at the hip or spine, patients with a result above the upper threshold are unlikely to have osteoporosis, while those between the two thresholds require a hip and spine BMD examination for a definitive diagnosis. This report presents data from a multicenter study to establish the triage thresholds for a range of pDXA devices in use in the UK. The subjects were white female patients aged 55–70 years who met the normal referral criteria for a BMD examination. For each device, at least 70 women with osteoporosis at the hip or spine and 70 women without osteoporosis were enrolled. All women had hip and spine BMD measurements using axial DXA systems that were interpreted using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) reference range for the hip and the manufacturersrsquo reference ranges for the spine. Data are presented for five different devices: the Osteometer DTX-200 (forearm BMD), the Schick AccuDEXA (hand BMD), the GE Lunar PIXI (heel BMD), the Alara MetriScan (hand BMD), and the Demetech Calscan (heel BMD). The clinical measurements were supplemented by theoretical modeling to estimate the age dependence of the triage thresholds and the effect of the correlation coefficient between pDXA and axial BMD on the percentage of women referred for an axial BMD examination. In summary, this study provides thresholds for implementing the new NOS guidelines for managing osteoporosis using pDXA devices. The figures reported apply to postmenopausal white women aged 55–70 years who meet the conventional criteria for a BMD examination. The results confirm that the thresholds are specific to each type of pDXA device and that the NOS triage algorithm requires 40% of women to have an axial DXA examination.On behalf of the National Osteoporosis Society Bone Densitometry Forum.
Keywords:Bone mineral density  Osteoporosis  Peripheral x-ray absorptiometry
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号