首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

改良式包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术治疗包皮过长疗效对比
引用本文:万久恺,郝斌,李宝兴.改良式包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术治疗包皮过长疗效对比[J].河南外科学杂志,2010,16(1).
作者姓名:万久恺  郝斌  李宝兴
作者单位:1. 郑州大学第二附属医院泌尿外科,郑州,450014
2. 深圳市第七人民医院泌尿外科,深圳,518081
摘    要:目的比较改良式包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术治疗包皮过长的效果。方法行包皮环切术治疗包皮过长112例,其中改良式包皮环切术64例(A组),传统包皮环切术48例(B组)。结果2组间在手术时间,术中出血量方面的差异具有统计学意义(P0.001)。A组发生术后创口出血或血肿3例,阴茎水肿2例,无伤口感染。B组发生术后创口出血或血肿9例,阴茎水肿9例,伤口感染1例。2组间并发症发生率的差异具有统计学意义。结论改良式包皮环切术与传统包皮环切术相比更具有优越性。

关 键 词:包皮过长  包皮环切术

Comparision of the effect of the improved circumcision and the traditional circumcision in treating redundant prepuce
Wan Jiukai,Hao Bing,Li Baoxing.Comparision of the effect of the improved circumcision and the traditional circumcision in treating redundant prepuce[J].Henan JOurnal of Surgery,2010,16(1).
Authors:Wan Jiukai  Hao Bing  Li Baoxing
Institution:(1Department of Urology; Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Zhengzhou 450014; China; 2Depart-ment of Urology; Seventh People’s Hospital of Shenzhen; Shenzhen518081; China);
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of the improved circumcision and the traditional circumcision in treating redundant prepuce.Methods 112 cases of redundant prepuce were treated by circumcision.64 received improved circumcision(group A),and 48 received traditional circumcision(group B).Results The differences between the two groups in operative time and hemorrhagic amount were statistically significant(P<0.001).Postoperative bleeding or hematoma,dropsy of penis in group A were 3,2 cases respectively,there ...
Keywords:redundant prepuce  circumcision
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号