舒适护理对门诊输液患者心理健康的影响

目的：探讨舒适护理对门诊输液患者心理健康的影响。方法：将门诊输液患者120例随机分为观察组和对照组各60例。对照组采用常规护理，观察组应用舒适护理，观察2组Zung氏焦虑自评量表（SAS）、Zung氏抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分以及护理服务（技能操作、疼痛程度和健康教育）满意度。结果：护理前，2组SAS、SDS评分无明显差异（P＞0.05）；护理后，观察组SAS、SDS评分分别为（44.36＆#177;4.89）分和（43.80＆#177;4.29）分，低于对照组的（47.68＆#177;4.77）分和（47.04＆#177;4.09）分（P＜0.05）；观察组技能操作满意度、疼痛程度和健康教育满意度评分分别为（92.68＆#177;2.98）分、（92.28＆#177;3.31）分和（94.96＆#177;3.30）分，高于对照组的（89.56＆#177;3.06）分、（89.16＆#177;2.97）分和（92.32＆#177;2.88）分（P＜0.05）。结论：舒适护理能改善门诊输液患者的心理健康，提高护理服务满意度。

Effects of Comfort Care on Mental Health of Outpatients with Intravenous Dripping

Objective： To explore the influence of comfort care on mental health of outpatients with intra-venous dripping. Methods：All 120 patients were randomized into the observation group and the control group equal-ly. The control group were administered with routine care and the observation group comfort care, SAS, SDS and satisfactory degrees of the nursing （skills operation, the degree of pain and health education） were investigated in both groups. Results：Before the care, the difference of SAS and SDS between both groups was insignificant（P＆gt;0.05）, after the care, SAS and SDS of the observation group were respectively （44.36＆#177;4.89） and （43.80＆#177;4.29）, significantly lower than （47.68＆#177;4.77） and （47.04＆#177;4.09） of the control group （P＆lt;0.05）;the satisfactory degree scales of skill oper-ation, pain and health education in the observation group were respectively （92.68＆#177;2.98）, （92.28＆#177;3.31） and （94.96＆#177; 3.30）, evidently higher than （89.56＆#177;3.06）, （89.16＆#177;2.97） and （92.32＆#177;2.88） （P＆lt;0.05）. Conclusion：Comfort care could improve mental health of the outpatients with intravenous dripping and satisfactory degree of the care.