首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Conduction Abnormalities After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Authors:Troels H. Jørgensen  Ole De Backer  Thomas A. Gerds  Gintautas Bieliauskas  Jesper H. Svendsen  Lars Søndergaard
Affiliation:1. Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark;2. Section of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Abstract:

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess mortality and rehospitalization in patients with new bundle branch block (BBB) and/or permanent pacemaker (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Background

Previous studies have provided inconsistent results on the clinical impact of new BBB or new PPM after TAVR.

Methods

A total of 816 consecutive patients without pre-procedural BBB or PPM undergoing TAVR between 2007 and 2017 were followed for 5 years or until data extraction in September 2017. Data on vital status and hospitalization were obtained through national registries.

Results

Within 30 days post-TAVR, new BBB without PPM and new PPM occurred in 247 (30.3%) and 132 (16.2%) patients, respectively, leaving 437 patients (53.6%) without conduction abnormalities. Median follow-up was 2.5 years (interquartile range: 1.0 to 4.9 years). One-year all-cause mortality was increased for new BBB (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18 to 3.67) but not for new PPM (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.72 to 3.74) compared with patients with no conduction abnormalities. The risk for late all-cause mortality (≥1 year after TAVR) was higher both for patients with new BBB (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.59) and for those with new PPM (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.46) compared with patients with no conduction abnormalities. Patients with new BBB (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.12) and new PPM (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.54) had a higher risk for heart failure hospitalization and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.0001 for both groups) during follow-up.

Conclusions

New BBB and new PPM developed frequently after TAVR. New BBB was associated with increased early and late all-cause mortality, whereas new PPM was associated with late all-cause mortality. Furthermore, both new BBB and new PPM increased the risk for heart failure hospitalizations.
Keywords:bundle branch block  conduction abnormality  pacemaker  transcatheter aortic valve replacement  BBB  bundle branch block  CA  conduction abnormality  CI  confidence interval  HR  hazard ratio  IQR  interquartile range  LBBB  left bundle branch block  LVEF  left ventricular ejection fraction  PPM  permanent pacemaker  PVR  paravalvular regurgitation  RBBB  right bundle branch block  RVP  right ventricular pacing  TAVR  transcatheter aortic valve replacement  THV  transcatheter heart valve
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号